[Intel-gfx] [RFC 06/31] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_init_swizzling to intel_gt
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Jun 14 15:25:12 UTC 2019
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:17:06PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>
> Start using the newly introduced struct intel_gt to fuse together correct
> logical init flow with uncore for more removal of implicit dev_priv in
> mmio access.
>
> v2:
> * Move code to i915_gem_fence_reg. (Chris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 25 +--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h | 3 ++
> 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 97155c5eb7e1..1df76f7c717e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -2935,7 +2935,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
>
> intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
>
> - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
> + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
> i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
>
> enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
> @@ -3036,7 +3036,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
> * No point of rolling back things in case of an error, as the best
> * we can do is to hope that things will still work (and disable RPM).
> */
> - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
> + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
> i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index e2c8813c9355..1eb203fdee60 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2586,7 +2586,6 @@ bool i915_gem_unset_wedged(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void i915_gem_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
> int __must_check i915_gem_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int __must_check i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> -void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void i915_gem_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void i915_gem_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int i915_gem_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 7fdf252f9322..5c0db934315b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1205,29 +1205,6 @@ void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> }
>
> -void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 5 ||
> - dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE)
> - return;
> -
> - I915_WRITE(DISP_ARB_CTL, I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL) |
> - DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING);
> -
> - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5))
> - return;
> -
> - I915_WRITE(TILECTL, I915_READ(TILECTL) | TILECTL_SWZCTL);
> - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
> - I915_WRITE(ARB_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_SNB));
> - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
> - I915_WRITE(ARB_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_IVB));
> - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8))
> - I915_WRITE(GAMTARBMODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_BDW));
> - else
> - BUG();
> -}
> -
> static void init_unused_ring(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 base)
> {
> I915_WRITE(RING_CTL(base), 0);
> @@ -1274,7 +1251,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> /* ...and determine whether they are sticking. */
> intel_gt_verify_workarounds(dev_priv, "init");
>
> - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
> + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
>
> /*
> * At least 830 can leave some of the unused rings
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> index 1c9466676caf..fc268599a0c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
> @@ -834,3 +834,40 @@ void i915_ggtt_init_fences(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
>
> i915_gem_restore_fences(i915);
> }
> +
> +void intel_gt_init_swizzling(struct intel_gt *gt)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> + struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> +
> + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 5 ||
> + i915->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE)
> + return;
> +
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> + DISP_ARB_CTL,
> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, DISP_ARB_CTL) |
> + DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING);
could we change this to intel_uncore_rmw ?
> +
> + if (IS_GEN(i915, 5))
> + return;
> +
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> + TILECTL,
> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, TILECTL) | TILECTL_SWZCTL);
and here as well?
> +
> + if (IS_GEN(i915, 6))
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> + ARB_MODE,
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_SNB));
> + else if (IS_GEN(i915, 7))
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> + ARB_MODE,
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_IVB));
> + else if (IS_GEN(i915, 8))
> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
> + GAMTARBMODE,
> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_BDW));
> + else
> + MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h
> index d2da98828179..37e4f104f7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object;
> struct drm_i915_private;
> struct i915_ggtt;
> struct i915_vma;
> +struct intel_gt;
> struct sg_table;
>
> #define I965_FENCE_PAGE 4096UL
> @@ -66,4 +67,6 @@ void i915_gem_object_save_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>
> void i915_ggtt_init_fences(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt);
>
> +void intel_gt_init_swizzling(struct intel_gt *gt);
> +
> #endif
> --
> 2.20.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list