[Intel-gfx] [RFC 06/31] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_init_swizzling to intel_gt
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 14 15:36:57 UTC 2019
On 14/06/2019 16:25, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:17:06PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> Start using the newly introduced struct intel_gt to fuse together correct
>> logical init flow with uncore for more removal of implicit dev_priv in
>> mmio access.
>>
>> v2:
>> * Move code to i915_gem_fence_reg. (Chris)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 25 +--------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h | 3 ++
>> 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> index 97155c5eb7e1..1df76f7c717e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>> @@ -2935,7 +2935,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
>>
>> intel_uc_resume(dev_priv);
>>
>> - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
>> + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
>> i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
>>
>> enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(dev_priv);
>> @@ -3036,7 +3036,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
>> * No point of rolling back things in case of an error, as the best
>> * we can do is to hope that things will still work (and disable RPM).
>> */
>> - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
>> + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
>> i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index e2c8813c9355..1eb203fdee60 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -2586,7 +2586,6 @@ bool i915_gem_unset_wedged(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void i915_gem_init_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>> int __must_check i915_gem_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> int __must_check i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> -void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void i915_gem_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void i915_gem_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> int i915_gem_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> index 7fdf252f9322..5c0db934315b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> @@ -1205,29 +1205,6 @@ void i915_gem_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
>> }
>>
>> -void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> -{
>> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 5 ||
>> - dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - I915_WRITE(DISP_ARB_CTL, I915_READ(DISP_ARB_CTL) |
>> - DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING);
>> -
>> - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5))
>> - return;
>> -
>> - I915_WRITE(TILECTL, I915_READ(TILECTL) | TILECTL_SWZCTL);
>> - if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6))
>> - I915_WRITE(ARB_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_SNB));
>> - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 7))
>> - I915_WRITE(ARB_MODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_IVB));
>> - else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 8))
>> - I915_WRITE(GAMTARBMODE, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_BDW));
>> - else
>> - BUG();
>> -}
>> -
>> static void init_unused_ring(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 base)
>> {
>> I915_WRITE(RING_CTL(base), 0);
>> @@ -1274,7 +1251,7 @@ int i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> /* ...and determine whether they are sticking. */
>> intel_gt_verify_workarounds(dev_priv, "init");
>>
>> - i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev_priv);
>> + intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
>>
>> /*
>> * At least 830 can leave some of the unused rings
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
>> index 1c9466676caf..fc268599a0c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c
>> @@ -834,3 +834,40 @@ void i915_ggtt_init_fences(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
>>
>> i915_gem_restore_fences(i915);
>> }
>> +
>> +void intel_gt_init_swizzling(struct intel_gt *gt)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
>> + struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
>> +
>> + if (INTEL_GEN(i915) < 5 ||
>> + i915->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x == I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
>> + DISP_ARB_CTL,
>> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, DISP_ARB_CTL) |
>> + DISP_TILE_SURFACE_SWIZZLING);
>
> could we change this to intel_uncore_rmw ?
>
>> +
>> + if (IS_GEN(i915, 5))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
>> + TILECTL,
>> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, TILECTL) | TILECTL_SWZCTL);
>
> and here as well?
Yes of course.. marking as TODO.
Regards,
Tvrtko
>> +
>> + if (IS_GEN(i915, 6))
>> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
>> + ARB_MODE,
>> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_SNB));
>> + else if (IS_GEN(i915, 7))
>> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
>> + ARB_MODE,
>> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_IVB));
>> + else if (IS_GEN(i915, 8))
>> + intel_uncore_write(uncore,
>> + GAMTARBMODE,
>> + _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_BDW));
>> + else
>> + MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(i915));
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h
>> index d2da98828179..37e4f104f7c0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.h
>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object;
>> struct drm_i915_private;
>> struct i915_ggtt;
>> struct i915_vma;
>> +struct intel_gt;
>> struct sg_table;
>>
>> #define I965_FENCE_PAGE 4096UL
>> @@ -66,4 +67,6 @@ void i915_gem_object_save_bit_17_swizzle(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>
>> void i915_ggtt_init_fences(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt);
>>
>> +void intel_gt_init_swizzling(struct intel_gt *gt);
>> +
>> #endif
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list