[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/23] drm/i915: Add state verification for the TypeC port mode
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Tue Jun 25 19:23:51 UTC 2019
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 05:12:52PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 05:05:58PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Add state verification for the TypeC port mode wrt. the port's AUX power
> > well enabling/disabling. Also check the correctness of changing the port
> > mode:
> > - When enabling/disabling the AUX power well for a TypeC port we must hold
> > already the TypeC port lock.
> > - When changing the TypeC port mode the port's AUX power domain must be
> > disabled.
> >
> > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 10 +-
> > 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > index fd13cd68deae..f4613e10c3b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include "intel_drv.h"
> > #include "intel_hotplug.h"
> > #include "intel_sideband.h"
> > +#include "intel_tc.h"
> >
> > bool intel_display_power_well_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > enum i915_power_well_id power_well_id);
> > @@ -447,26 +448,110 @@ icl_combo_phy_aux_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > #define ICL_TBT_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx) \
> > ((pw_idx) - ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_AUX_TBT1 + AUX_CH_C)
> >
> > +static enum aux_ch icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > +{
> > + int pw_idx = power_well->desc->hsw.idx;
> > +
> > + return power_well->desc->hsw.is_tc_tbt ? ICL_TBT_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx) :
> > + ICL_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> > +
> > +static u64 async_put_domains_mask(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains);
> > +
> > +static int power_well_async_ref_count(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > +{
> > + enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> > + u64 async_domains = async_put_domains_mask(&dev_priv->power_domains);
> > + int refs = 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_power_domain(domain, power_well->desc->domains)
> > + refs += !!(async_domains & BIT_ULL(domain));
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(refs > power_well->count);
>
> hweight64() not sufficient here?
Ah, just return hweight64(power_well->desc->domains & async_domains)?
Yep, that would work, didn't occur to me..
>
> > +
> > + return refs;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > +{
> > + enum aux_ch aux_ch = icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(dev_priv, power_well);
> > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = NULL;
> > + struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> > +
> > + /* Bypass the check if all references are released asynchronously */
> > + if (power_well_async_ref_count(dev_priv, power_well) ==
> > + power_well->count)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + aux_ch = icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +
> > + for_each_intel_encoder(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
> > + if (!intel_port_is_tc(dev_priv, encoder->port))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* We'll check the MST primary port */
> > + if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&encoder->base);
> > + if (WARN_ON(!dig_port))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (dig_port->aux_ch != aux_ch) {
> > + dig_port = NULL;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON(!dig_port))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(!intel_tc_port_ref_held(dig_port));
> > +}
> > +
> > +#else
> > +
> > +static void icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static void
> > icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > {
> > - int pw_idx = power_well->desc->hsw.idx;
> > - bool is_tbt = power_well->desc->hsw.is_tc_tbt;
> > - enum aux_ch aux_ch;
> > + enum aux_ch aux_ch = icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(dev_priv, power_well);
> > u32 val;
> >
> > - aux_ch = is_tbt ? ICL_TBT_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx) :
> > - ICL_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx);
> > + icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +
> > val = I915_READ(DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch));
> > val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO;
> > - if (is_tbt)
> > + if (power_well->desc->hsw.is_tc_tbt)
> > val |= DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO;
> > I915_WRITE(DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch), val);
> >
> > hsw_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well);
> > }
> >
> > +static void
> > +icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > +{
> > + icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +
> > + hsw_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * We should only use the power well if we explicitly asked the hardware to
> > * enable it, so check if it's enabled and also check if we've requested it to
> > @@ -3119,7 +3204,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_ops icl_combo_phy_aux_power_well_ops = {
> > static const struct i915_power_well_ops icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_ops = {
> > .sync_hw = hsw_power_well_sync_hw,
> > .enable = icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_enable,
> > - .disable = hsw_power_well_disable,
> > + .disable = icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_disable,
> > .is_enabled = hsw_power_well_enabled,
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > index c8904911e841..6c43becf97f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ static void intel_tc_port_reset_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > enum tc_port_mode old_tc_mode = dig_port->tc_mode;
> >
> > intel_display_power_flush_work(dev_priv);
> > + WARN_ON(intel_display_power_is_enabled(dev_priv,
> > + intel_aux_power_domain(dig_port)));
> >
> > icl_tc_phy_disconnect(dig_port);
> > icl_tc_phy_connect(dig_port, required_lanes);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > index 31af7be96070..8adc107cdbcb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
> > #define __INTEL_TC_H__
> >
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > -
> > -struct intel_digital_port;
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include "intel_drv.h"
> >
> > void icl_tc_phy_disconnect(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> >
> > @@ -23,6 +23,12 @@ void intel_tc_port_get_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > int required_lanes);
> > void intel_tc_port_put_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> >
> > +static inline int intel_tc_port_ref_held(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> > +{
> > + return mutex_is_locked(&dig_port->tc_lock) ||
> > + dig_port->tc_link_refcount;
>
> This will allow tc_lock to not be held if the refcount is elevated. Was
> that the intention? The commit message says the lock should always be
> held.
Right, the commit message is not precise, it should be:
- When enabling/disabling the AUX power well for a TypeC port we must hold
the TypeC port lock - the case for AUX transfers - or hold a Type C
port link reference - the case for modeset enabling/disabling.
Does that make sense?
>
> Should we do a lockdep assert here if lockdep is enabled?
If the above criteria for enabling/disabling the power wells sounds ok, then
mutex_is_locked(tc_lock) || tc_link_refcount would be enough.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > void intel_tc_port_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool is_legacy);
> >
> > #endif /* __INTEL_TC_H__ */
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list