[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/23] drm/i915: Add state verification for the TypeC port mode
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Jun 26 11:52:24 UTC 2019
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:23:51PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 05:12:52PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 05:05:58PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Add state verification for the TypeC port mode wrt. the port's AUX power
> > > well enabling/disabling. Also check the correctness of changing the port
> > > mode:
> > > - When enabling/disabling the AUX power well for a TypeC port we must hold
> > > already the TypeC port lock.
> > > - When changing the TypeC port mode the port's AUX power domain must be
> > > disabled.
> > >
> > > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 2 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h | 10 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > index fd13cd68deae..f4613e10c3b3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > #include "intel_drv.h"
> > > #include "intel_hotplug.h"
> > > #include "intel_sideband.h"
> > > +#include "intel_tc.h"
> > >
> > > bool intel_display_power_well_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > enum i915_power_well_id power_well_id);
> > > @@ -447,26 +448,110 @@ icl_combo_phy_aux_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > #define ICL_TBT_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx) \
> > > ((pw_idx) - ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_AUX_TBT1 + AUX_CH_C)
> > >
> > > +static enum aux_ch icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > > +{
> > > + int pw_idx = power_well->desc->hsw.idx;
> > > +
> > > + return power_well->desc->hsw.is_tc_tbt ? ICL_TBT_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx) :
> > > + ICL_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> > > +
> > > +static u64 async_put_domains_mask(struct i915_power_domains *power_domains);
> > > +
> > > +static int power_well_async_ref_count(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > > +{
> > > + enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> > > + u64 async_domains = async_put_domains_mask(&dev_priv->power_domains);
> > > + int refs = 0;
> > > +
> > > + for_each_power_domain(domain, power_well->desc->domains)
> > > + refs += !!(async_domains & BIT_ULL(domain));
> > > +
> > > + WARN_ON(refs > power_well->count);
> >
> > hweight64() not sufficient here?
>
> Ah, just return hweight64(power_well->desc->domains & async_domains)?
> Yep, that would work, didn't occur to me..
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + return refs;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > > +{
> > > + enum aux_ch aux_ch = icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(dev_priv, power_well);
> > > + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = NULL;
> > > + struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> > > +
> > > + /* Bypass the check if all references are released asynchronously */
> > > + if (power_well_async_ref_count(dev_priv, power_well) ==
> > > + power_well->count)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + aux_ch = icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(dev_priv, power_well);
> > > +
> > > + for_each_intel_encoder(&dev_priv->drm, encoder) {
> > > + if (!intel_port_is_tc(dev_priv, encoder->port))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + /* We'll check the MST primary port */
> > > + if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&encoder->base);
> > > + if (WARN_ON(!dig_port))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + if (dig_port->aux_ch != aux_ch) {
> > > + dig_port = NULL;
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (WARN_ON(!dig_port))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + WARN_ON(!intel_tc_port_ref_held(dig_port));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#else
> > > +
> > > +static void icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > static void
> > > icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > > {
> > > - int pw_idx = power_well->desc->hsw.idx;
> > > - bool is_tbt = power_well->desc->hsw.is_tc_tbt;
> > > - enum aux_ch aux_ch;
> > > + enum aux_ch aux_ch = icl_tc_phy_aux_ch(dev_priv, power_well);
> > > u32 val;
> > >
> > > - aux_ch = is_tbt ? ICL_TBT_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx) :
> > > - ICL_AUX_PW_TO_CH(pw_idx);
> > > + icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(dev_priv, power_well);
> > > +
> > > val = I915_READ(DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch));
> > > val &= ~DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO;
> > > - if (is_tbt)
> > > + if (power_well->desc->hsw.is_tc_tbt)
> > > val |= DP_AUX_CH_CTL_TBT_IO;
> > > I915_WRITE(DP_AUX_CH_CTL(aux_ch), val);
> > >
> > > hsw_power_well_enable(dev_priv, power_well);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void
> > > +icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > + struct i915_power_well *power_well)
> > > +{
> > > + icl_tc_port_assert_ref_held(dev_priv, power_well);
> > > +
> > > + hsw_power_well_disable(dev_priv, power_well);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * We should only use the power well if we explicitly asked the hardware to
> > > * enable it, so check if it's enabled and also check if we've requested it to
> > > @@ -3119,7 +3204,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_ops icl_combo_phy_aux_power_well_ops = {
> > > static const struct i915_power_well_ops icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_ops = {
> > > .sync_hw = hsw_power_well_sync_hw,
> > > .enable = icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_enable,
> > > - .disable = hsw_power_well_disable,
> > > + .disable = icl_tc_phy_aux_power_well_disable,
> > > .is_enabled = hsw_power_well_enabled,
> > > };
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > > index c8904911e841..6c43becf97f7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> > > @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ static void intel_tc_port_reset_mode(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > > enum tc_port_mode old_tc_mode = dig_port->tc_mode;
> > >
> > > intel_display_power_flush_work(dev_priv);
> > > + WARN_ON(intel_display_power_is_enabled(dev_priv,
> > > + intel_aux_power_domain(dig_port)));
> > >
> > > icl_tc_phy_disconnect(dig_port);
> > > icl_tc_phy_connect(dig_port, required_lanes);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > > index 31af7be96070..8adc107cdbcb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.h
> > > @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
> > > #define __INTEL_TC_H__
> > >
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > -
> > > -struct intel_digital_port;
> > > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > > +#include "intel_drv.h"
> > >
> > > void icl_tc_phy_disconnect(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> > >
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,12 @@ void intel_tc_port_get_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> > > int required_lanes);
> > > void intel_tc_port_put_link(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port);
> > >
> > > +static inline int intel_tc_port_ref_held(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> > > +{
> > > + return mutex_is_locked(&dig_port->tc_lock) ||
> > > + dig_port->tc_link_refcount;
> >
> > This will allow tc_lock to not be held if the refcount is elevated. Was
> > that the intention? The commit message says the lock should always be
> > held.
>
> Right, the commit message is not precise, it should be:
>
> - When enabling/disabling the AUX power well for a TypeC port we must hold
> the TypeC port lock - the case for AUX transfers - or hold a Type C
> port link reference - the case for modeset enabling/disabling.
>
> Does that make sense?
Yeah, I guess that's fine.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> >
> > Should we do a lockdep assert here if lockdep is enabled?
>
> If the above criteria for enabling/disabling the power wells sounds ok, then
> mutex_is_locked(tc_lock) || tc_link_refcount would be enough.
>
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > void intel_tc_port_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, bool is_legacy);
> > >
> > > #endif /* __INTEL_TC_H__ */
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list