[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/ehl: Enable DDI-D

[Souza, Jose]

On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 15:19 -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 01:52:16PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 19:01 -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > EHL has four DDI's (DDI-A and DDI-D share combo PHY A).
> > > 
> > > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > index e72ace42327c..74cd180360f4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > > @@ -15128,6 +15128,7 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > >  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> > >  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> > >  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
> > > +		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
> > 
> > Here we should only initialize only the one that is going to be
> > used A
> > or D at this point we already have that information and the mux
> > set.
> 
> Doesn't intel_ddi_init() already take care of this for us?  I.e.,
> init_hdmi and init_dp will both be false for whichever DDI isn't in
> use
> so the function should just bail out with a DRM_DEBUG_KMS() message
> and
> not really do anything if I'm understanding correctly.

Good point, lets hope that VBT is set this clean.

> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> > >  		icl_dsi_init(dev_priv);
> > >  	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > >  		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);