[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 1/1] i915_pm_rpm: remove gem-execbuf-stress-extra-wait because same as gem-execbuf-stress

[Caz Yokoyama]

Extra 5sec delay does not add any value more than gem-execbuf-stress.
It waits until suspend state after a job is added by gem_execbuf().
There is no need to do more when GPU becomes suspended state.
I confirm this by looking at pm_runtime_force_suspend() which exits
on suspend state.

Signed-off-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama at intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
index be296f52..9a91ca0a 100644
--- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
+++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_rpm.c
@@ -1338,12 +1338,13 @@ static void gem_execbuf_stress_subtest(int rounds, int wait_flags)
 	for (i = 0; i < rounds; i++) {
 		gem_execbuf(drm_fd, &execbuf);
 
-		if (wait_flags & WAIT_STATUS)
+		if (wait_flags & WAIT_STATUS) {
+			/* clean up idle work */
+			igt_drop_caches_set(drm_fd, DROP_IDLE);
 			igt_assert(wait_for_suspended());
+		}
 		if (wait_flags & WAIT_PC8_RES)
 			igt_assert(pc8_plus_residency_changed(30));
-		if (wait_flags & WAIT_EXTRA)
-			sleep(5);
 	}
 
 	gem_close(drm_fd, handle);
@@ -2083,8 +2084,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 		gem_execbuf_stress_subtest(rounds, WAIT_STATUS);
 	igt_subtest("gem-execbuf-stress-pc8")
 		gem_execbuf_stress_subtest(rounds, WAIT_PC8_RES);
-	igt_subtest("gem-execbuf-stress-extra-wait")
-		gem_execbuf_stress_subtest(rounds, WAIT_STATUS | WAIT_EXTRA);
 
 	/* power-wake reference tests */
 	igt_subtest("pm-tiling")
-- 
2.17.1