[Intel-gfx] Reconfigurable OA queries

[Lionel Landwerlin]

On 09/10/2019 09:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-09 07:40:54)
>> On 09/10/2019 02:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-09 00:14:41)
>>>> If we start reusing it for extended parameters, we need to make fences
>>>> the first extended param.
>>> Why?
>>>
>> How do we pass a reconfigure of OA together with an array of fences?
> They are independent extensions, you pass none, one or the other, or
> both. Without the fence extension you have to choose...
>
> I get your point, but that means the first patch that introduces the
> extension mechanism should be providing the means to supply the existing
> array (if it wants to remain a separate patch).
> -Chris
>
Yeah, we should merge those 2 patches then.


-Lionel