[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] [v5] drm/i915/color: Extract icl_read_luts()
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Oct 9 14:16:11 UTC 2019
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:25:41PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
> For icl+, have hw read out to create hw blob of gamma
> lut values. icl+ platforms supports multi segmented gamma
> mode by default, add hw lut creation for this mode.
>
> This will be used to validate gamma programming using dsb
> (display state buffer) which is a tgl specific feature.
>
> Major change done-removal of readouts of coarse and fine segments
> because PAL_PREC_DATA register isn't giving propoer values.
> State checker limited only to "fine segment"
>
> v2: -readout code for multisegmented gamma has to come
> up with some intermediate entries that aren't preserved
> in hardware (Jani N)
> -linear interpolation (Ville)
> -moved common code to check gamma_enable to specific funcs,
> since icl doesn't support that
> v3: -use u16 instead of __u16 [Jani N]
> -used single lut [Jani N]
> -improved and more readable for loops [Jani N]
> -read values directly to actual locations and then fill gaps [Jani N]
> -moved cleaning to patch 1 [Jani N]
> -renamed icl_read_lut_multi_seg() to icl_read_lut_multi_segment to
> make it similar to icl_load_luts()
> -renamed icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_blob() to
> icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_lut_values() more sensible, I guess
> v4: -removed interpolated func for creating gamma lut values
> -removed readouts of fine and coarse segments, failure to read PAL_PREC_DATA
> correctly
> v5: -added gamma_enable check inside read_luts()
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 ++
> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> index fa44eb73d088..614e0ad386ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> @@ -1477,6 +1477,25 @@ static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> }
> }
>
> +static int icl_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> + return 8;
> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> + return 10;
> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
> + return 16;
> + default:
> + MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> +}
> +
> int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> @@ -1488,7 +1507,9 @@ int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_stat
> else
> return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> } else {
> - if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> + return icl_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> + else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> return glk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> else if (IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv))
> return ilk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
> @@ -1519,6 +1540,20 @@ static bool intel_color_lut_entry_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
> + struct drm_color_lut *lut2,
> + int lut_size, u32 err)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
> + if (!err_check(&lut1[i], &lut2[i], err))
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
> struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
> u32 gamma_mode, u32 bit_precision)
> @@ -1537,16 +1572,8 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
> lut_size2 = drm_color_lut_size(blob2);
>
> /* check sw and hw lut size */
> - switch (gamma_mode) {
> - case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> - case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> - if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
> - return false;
> - break;
> - default:
> - MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
> - return false;
> - }
> + if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
> + return false;
>
> lut1 = blob1->data;
> lut2 = blob2->data;
> @@ -1554,13 +1581,18 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
> err = 0xffff >> bit_precision;
>
> /* check sw and hw lut entry to be equal */
> - switch (gamma_mode) {
> + switch (gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
> case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
> if (!intel_color_lut_entry_equal(lut1, lut2,
> lut_size2, err))
> return false;
> break;
> + case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
> + if (!intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(lut1, lut2,
> + lut_size2, err))
I don't think you need a new function for that. Just pass 9 as the size
to intel_color_lut_entry_equal() ?
Hmm, should probably rename that to just intel_color_lut_equal() since
it checks the entire LUT (or at least the specified subset) and not
just a single entry...
> + return false;
> + break;
> default:
> MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
> return false;
> @@ -1815,6 +1847,63 @@ static void glk_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
> }
>
> +static struct drm_property_blob *
> +icl_read_lut_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + int lut_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
> + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> + struct drm_property_blob *blob;
> + struct drm_color_lut *blob_data;
> + u32 i, val1, val2;
> +
> + blob = drm_property_create_blob(&dev_priv->drm,
> + sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) * lut_size,
> + NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(blob))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + blob_data = blob->data;
> +
> + I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe), PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
> + val1 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
> + val2 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
> +
> + blob_data[i].red = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
> + REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK, val1);
> + blob_data[i].green = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
> + REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK, val1);
> + blob_data[i].blue = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
> + REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK, val1);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME readouts from PAL_PREC_DATA register aren't giving correct values
> + * in the case of fine and coarse segments. Restricting readouts only for
> + * super fine segment as of now.
> + */
> +
> + return blob;
> +}
> +
> +static void icl_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
> + GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
Please make this a switch statement.
I pushed patches 1-2 to dinq. Thanks.
> + crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = i9xx_read_lut_8(crtc_state);
> + else if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
> + GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED)
> + crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = icl_read_lut_multi_segment(crtc_state);
> + else
> + crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
> +}
> +
> void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> @@ -1858,6 +1947,7 @@ void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> dev_priv->display.load_luts = icl_load_luts;
> + dev_priv->display.read_luts = icl_read_luts;
> } else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
> dev_priv->display.load_luts = glk_load_luts;
> dev_priv->display.read_luts = glk_read_luts;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 1dc067fc57ab..06b6398b7d62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -10584,6 +10584,12 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>
> #define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_A 0x4A40C
> #define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_B 0x4AC0C
> +#define PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
> +#define PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(29, 20)
> +#define PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 14)
> +#define PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 10)
> +#define PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(9, 4)
> +#define PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(9, 0)
>
> #define PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
> _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_A, \
> --
> 2.23.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list