[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] [v5] drm/i915/color: Extract icl_read_luts()

Sharma, Swati2 swati2.sharma at intel.com
Thu Oct 10 10:50:04 UTC 2019


On 09-Oct-19 7:46 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:25:41PM +0530, Swati Sharma wrote:
>> For icl+, have hw read out to create hw blob of gamma
>> lut values. icl+ platforms supports multi segmented gamma
>> mode by default, add hw lut creation for this mode.
>>
>> This will be used to validate gamma programming using dsb
>> (display state buffer) which is a tgl specific feature.
>>
>> Major change done-removal of readouts of coarse and fine segments
>> because PAL_PREC_DATA register isn't giving propoer values.
>> State checker limited only to "fine segment"
>>
>> v2: -readout code for multisegmented gamma has to come
>>       up with some intermediate entries that aren't preserved
>>       in hardware (Jani N)
>>      -linear interpolation (Ville)
>>      -moved common code to check gamma_enable to specific funcs,
>>       since icl doesn't support that
>> v3: -use u16 instead of __u16 [Jani N]
>>      -used single lut [Jani N]
>>      -improved and more readable for loops [Jani N]
>>      -read values directly to actual locations and then fill gaps [Jani N]
>>      -moved cleaning to patch 1 [Jani N]
>>      -renamed icl_read_lut_multi_seg() to icl_read_lut_multi_segment to
>>       make it similar to icl_load_luts()
>>      -renamed icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_blob() to
>>       icl_compute_interpolated_gamma_lut_values() more sensible, I guess
>> v4: -removed interpolated func for creating gamma lut values
>>      -removed readouts of fine and coarse segments, failure to read PAL_PREC_DATA
>>       correctly
>> v5: -added gamma_enable check inside read_luts()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h            |   6 ++
>>   2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> index fa44eb73d088..614e0ad386ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
>> @@ -1477,6 +1477,25 @@ static int glk_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int icl_gamma_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> +{
>> +	if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	switch (crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>> +		return 8;
>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>> +		return 10;
>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
>> +		return 16;
>> +	default:
>> +		MISSING_CASE(crtc_state->gamma_mode);
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>>   int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>   {
>>   	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>> @@ -1488,7 +1507,9 @@ int intel_color_get_gamma_bit_precision(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_stat
>>   		else
>>   			return i9xx_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>   	} else {
>> -		if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
>> +		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
>> +			return icl_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>> +		else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
>>   			return glk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>>   		else if (IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv))
>>   			return ilk_gamma_precision(crtc_state);
>> @@ -1519,6 +1540,20 @@ static bool intel_color_lut_entry_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
>>   	return true;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static bool intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
>> +					      struct drm_color_lut *lut2,
>> +					      int lut_size, u32 err)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
>> +		if (!err_check(&lut1[i], &lut2[i], err))
>> +			return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>   bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>>   			   struct drm_property_blob *blob2,
>>   			   u32 gamma_mode, u32 bit_precision)
>> @@ -1537,16 +1572,8 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>>   	lut_size2 = drm_color_lut_size(blob2);
>>   
>>   	/* check sw and hw lut size */
>> -	switch (gamma_mode) {
>> -	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>> -	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>> -		if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
>> -			return false;
>> -		break;
>> -	default:
>> -		MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
>> -			return false;
>> -	}
>> +	if (lut_size1 != lut_size2)
>> +		return false;
>>   
>>   	lut1 = blob1->data;
>>   	lut2 = blob2->data;
>> @@ -1554,13 +1581,18 @@ bool intel_color_lut_equal(struct drm_property_blob *blob1,
>>   	err = 0xffff >> bit_precision;
>>   
>>   	/* check sw and hw lut entry to be equal */
>> -	switch (gamma_mode) {
>> +	switch (gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) {
>>   	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT:
>>   	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_10BIT:
>>   		if (!intel_color_lut_entry_equal(lut1, lut2,
>>   						 lut_size2, err))
>>   			return false;
>>   		break;
>> +	case GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED:
>> +		if (!intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(lut1, lut2,
>> +						       lut_size2, err))
> 
> I don't think you need a new function for that. Just pass 9 as the size
> to intel_color_lut_entry_equal() ?

I had made a separate function for multi-segmented gamma since there 
will be 3 loops for comparing superfine, fine and course segments which 
wont go with intel_lut_entry_equal() structure.

Right now we are limiting to superfine segment only but in future we 
will add for other segments too (once we get fix from h/w)

Func() should look like this. Actually there is no need to passing 
lut_size only in this function if we continue with this function only.

+static bool intel_color_lut_entry_multi_equal(struct drm_color_lut *lut1,
+                                             struct drm_color_lut *lut2,
+                                             int lut_size, u32 err)
+{
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
+               if (!err_check(&lut1[i], &lut2[i], err))
+                       return false;
+       }
+
+       for (i = 1; i < 257; i++) {
+               if (!err_check(&lut1[i * 8], &lut2[i * 8], err))
+                       return false;
+       }
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
+               if (!err_check(&lut1[i * 8 * 128], &lut2[i * 8 * 128], err))
+                       return false;
+       }
+
+       return true;
+}
+
Please suggest.

> 
> Hmm, should probably rename that to just intel_color_lut_equal() since
> it checks the entire LUT (or at least the specified subset) and not
> just a single entry...

This will be fine for this segment but for other two segments it won't 
work. Right?
> 
>> +			return false;
>> +		break;
>>   	default:
>>   		MISSING_CASE(gamma_mode);
>>   			return false;
>> @@ -1815,6 +1847,63 @@ static void glk_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>   		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
>>   }
>>   
>> +static struct drm_property_blob *
>> +icl_read_lut_multi_segment(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> +	int lut_size = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->color.gamma_lut_size;
>> +	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>> +	struct drm_property_blob *blob;
>> +	struct drm_color_lut *blob_data;
>> +	u32 i, val1, val2;
>> +
>> +	blob = drm_property_create_blob(&dev_priv->drm,
>> +					sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) * lut_size,
>> +					NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(blob))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	blob_data = blob->data;
>> +
>> +	I915_WRITE(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe), PAL_PREC_AUTO_INCREMENT);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
>> +		val1 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
>> +		val2 = I915_READ(PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_DATA(pipe));
>> +
>> +		blob_data[i].red = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
>> +				   REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK, val1);
>> +		blob_data[i].green = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
>> +				     REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK, val1);
>> +		blob_data[i].blue = REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK, val2) << 6 |
>> +				    REG_FIELD_GET(PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK, val1);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * FIXME readouts from PAL_PREC_DATA register aren't giving correct values
>> +	 * in the case of fine and coarse segments. Restricting readouts only for
>> +	 * super fine segment as of now.
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	return blob;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void icl_read_luts(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>> +{
>> +	if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & POST_CSC_GAMMA_ENABLE) == 0)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
>> +	    GAMMA_MODE_MODE_8BIT)
> 
> Please make this a switch statement.
> 
> I pushed patches 1-2 to dinq. Thanks.
> 
>> +		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = i9xx_read_lut_8(crtc_state);
>> +	else if ((crtc_state->gamma_mode & GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK) ==
>> +		 GAMMA_MODE_MODE_12BIT_MULTI_SEGMENTED)
>> +		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = icl_read_lut_multi_segment(crtc_state);
>> +	else
>> +		crtc_state->base.gamma_lut = glk_read_lut_10(crtc_state, PAL_PREC_INDEX_VALUE(0));
>> +}
>> +
>>   void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>> @@ -1858,6 +1947,7 @@ void intel_color_init(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>   
>>   		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
>>   			dev_priv->display.load_luts = icl_load_luts;
>> +			dev_priv->display.read_luts = icl_read_luts;
>>   		} else if (IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv)) {
>>   			dev_priv->display.load_luts = glk_load_luts;
>>   			dev_priv->display.read_luts = glk_read_luts;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 1dc067fc57ab..06b6398b7d62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -10584,6 +10584,12 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>>   
>>   #define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_A	0x4A40C
>>   #define _PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_DATA_B	0x4AC0C
>> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_LDW_MASK   REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
>> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_RED_UDW_MASK   REG_GENMASK(29, 20)
>> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_LDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 14)
>> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_GREEN_UDW_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 10)
>> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_LDW_MASK  REG_GENMASK(9, 4)
>> +#define  PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_BLUE_UDW_MASK  REG_GENMASK(9, 0)
>>   
>>   #define PREC_PAL_MULTI_SEG_INDEX(pipe)	_MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \
>>   					_PAL_PREC_MULTI_SEG_INDEX_A, \
>> -- 
>> 2.23.0
> 


-- 
~Swati Sharma


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list