[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_panel_fitting: Fix plane scaling avoidance on gen7/gen8
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Mon Sep 2 21:10:17 UTC 2019
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:51:41PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 03:30:23PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > Most gen7 and gen8 platforms can't do plane scaling, so we need to
> > ensure the test doesn't try to do plane scaling on those platforms. The
> > legacy non-atomic subtest bakes these platform characteristics into the
> > test itself since legacy modesetting interfaces don't provide a way to
> > probe platform capabilities like atomic does.
> >
> > Maarten previously tried to address this with commit 24c5e0778
> > ("tests/kms_panel_fitting: Do not use scaling on gen7 and gen8, v2."),
> > but he augmented an existing test for gen9+pipeC which comes too late
> > since we've already turned on the plane at that point. We can fix this
> > by moving the test up higher; not only before we enable panel fitting,
> > but also before we turn on the sprite.
> >
> > Note that this still isn't a great subtest since it's very
> > Intel-specific, despite being part of a generic KMS test that's intended
> > for all vendors. A future enhancement might be to try to probe the
> > platform capabilities with a TEST_ONLY atomic operation before using the
> > legacy interfaces to actually program them.
> >
> > While touching the code, I also added some slight restructuring, added
> > additional comments, and broke up >80 char lines to add clarity to
> > what's going on.
> >
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Pushed, thanks for the review.
Matt
>
> > ---
> > tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> > index 491e429f..a942294b 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> > @@ -131,11 +131,10 @@ static void test_panel_fitting(data_t *d)
> > igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb2, d->plane2, 100, 100);
> > igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb2, d->plane2, d->fb2.width-200, d->fb2.height-200);
> > igt_plane_set_position(d->plane2, 100, 100);
> > - igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2, mode->hdisplay-200, mode->vdisplay-200);
> > - igt_display_commit2(display, COMMIT_UNIVERSAL);
> >
> > /*
> > - * most of gen7 and all of gen8 doesn't support scaling at all.
> > + * Most of gen7 and all of gen8 doesn't support plane scaling
> > + * at all.
> > *
> > * gen9 pipe C has only 1 scaler shared with the crtc, which
> > * means pipe scaling can't work simultaneously with panel
> > @@ -144,9 +143,24 @@ static void test_panel_fitting(data_t *d)
> > * Since this is the legacy path, userspace has to know about
> > * the HW limitations, whereas atomic can ask.
> > */
> > - if (IS_GEN8(devid) || (IS_GEN7(devid) && !IS_IVYBRIDGE(devid)) ||
> > + if (IS_GEN8(devid) ||
> > + (IS_GEN7(devid) && !IS_IVYBRIDGE(devid)) ||
> > (IS_GEN9(devid) && pipe == PIPE_C))
> > - igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2, d->fb2.width-200, d->fb2.height-200);
> > + /* same as visible area of fb => no scaling */
> > + igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2,
> > + d->fb2.width-200,
> > + d->fb2.height-200);
> > + else
> > + /*
> > + * different than visible area of fb => plane scaling
> > + * active
> > + */
> > + igt_plane_set_size(d->plane2,
> > + mode->hdisplay-200,
> > + mode->vdisplay-200);
> > +
> > + /* Plane scaling active (if possible), pfit off */
> > + igt_display_commit2(display, COMMIT_UNIVERSAL);
> >
> > /* enable panel fitting along with sprite scaling */
> > mode->hdisplay = 1024;
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
--
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list