[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic: Reject FLIP_ASYNC unconditionally

[Daniel Vetter]

It's never been wired up. Only userspace that tried to use it (and
didn't actually check whether anything works, but hey it builds) is
the -modesetting atomic implementation. And we just shut that up.

If there's anyone else then we need to silently accept this flag no
matter what, and find a new one. Because once a flag is tainted, it's
lost.

Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean at poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
index 5a5b42db6f2a..7a26bfb5329c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
@@ -1305,8 +1305,7 @@ int drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
 	if (arg->reserved)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if ((arg->flags & DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC) &&
-			!dev->mode_config.async_page_flip)
+	if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* can't test and expect an event at the same time. */
-- 
2.23.0