[Intel-gfx] [Nouveau] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node
Thierry Reding
thierry.reding at gmail.com
Tue Sep 10 21:52:59 UTC 2019
On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 09:58:46PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have no
> > > > > > test hardware). But maybe I missed some detail ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> > > > > into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary the GEM
> > > > > object can be initialized in between. I think that's slightly more
> > > > > flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that should work too.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> > > Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
> >
> > Thanks guys, applied to drm-misc-next.
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> Initial investigations suggest that this commit currently in drm-next
>
> commit 019cbd4a4feb3aa3a917d78e7110e3011bbff6d5
> Author: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> Date: Wed Aug 14 11:00:48 2019 +0200
>
> drm/nouveau: Initialize GEM object before TTM object
>
> breaks nouveau userspace which tries to allocate GEM objects with a
> non-page-aligned size. Previously nouveau_gem_new would just call
> nouveau_bo_init which would call nouveau_bo_fixup_align before
> initializing the GEM object. With this change, it is done after. What
> do you think -- OK to just move that bit of logic into the new
> nouveau_bo_alloc() (and make size/align be pointers so that they can
> be fixed up?)
Hi Ilia,
sorry, got side-tracked earlier and forgot to send this out. I'll turn
this into a proper patch, but if you manage to find the time to test
this while I work out the userspace issues that are preventing me from
testing this more thoroughly, that'd be great.
Thierry
--- >8 ---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index e918b437af17..7d5ede756711 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ nouveau_bo_fixup_align(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, u32 flags,
}
struct nouveau_bo *
-nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32 flags, u32 tile_mode,
- u32 tile_flags)
+nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 *size, int *align, u32 flags,
+ u32 tile_mode, u32 tile_flags)
{
struct nouveau_drm *drm = cli->drm;
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
@@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32 flags, u32 tile_mode,
struct nvif_vmm *vmm = cli->svm.cli ? &cli->svm.vmm : &cli->vmm.vmm;
int i, pi = -1;
- if (!size) {
- NV_WARN(drm, "skipped size %016llx\n", size);
+ if (!*size) {
+ NV_WARN(drm, "skipped size %016llx\n", *size);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32 flags, u32 tile_mode,
pi = i;
/* Stop once the buffer is larger than the current page size. */
- if (size >= 1ULL << vmm->page[i].shift)
+ if (*size >= 1ULL << vmm->page[i].shift)
break;
}
@@ -281,6 +281,8 @@ nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, u32 flags, u32 tile_mode,
}
nvbo->page = vmm->page[pi].shift;
+ nouveau_bo_fixup_align(nvbo, flags, align, size);
+
return nvbo;
}
@@ -292,12 +294,11 @@ nouveau_bo_init(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, u64 size, int align, u32 flags,
size_t acc_size;
int ret;
- acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(nvbo->bo.bdev, size, sizeof(*nvbo));
-
- nouveau_bo_fixup_align(nvbo, flags, &align, &size);
nvbo->bo.mem.num_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
nouveau_bo_placement_set(nvbo, flags, 0);
+ acc_size = ttm_bo_dma_acc_size(nvbo->bo.bdev, size, sizeof(*nvbo));
+
ret = ttm_bo_init(nvbo->bo.bdev, &nvbo->bo, size, type,
&nvbo->placement, align >> PAGE_SHIFT, false,
acc_size, sg, robj, nouveau_bo_del_ttm);
@@ -318,7 +319,8 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, int align,
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
int ret;
- nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, size, flags, tile_mode, tile_flags);
+ nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, &size, &align, flags, tile_mode,
+ tile_flags);
if (IS_ERR(nvbo))
return PTR_ERR(nvbo);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
index 62930d834fba..38f9d8350963 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ nouveau_bo_ref(struct nouveau_bo *ref, struct nouveau_bo **pnvbo)
extern struct ttm_bo_driver nouveau_bo_driver;
void nouveau_bo_move_init(struct nouveau_drm *);
-struct nouveau_bo *nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *, u64 size, u32 flags,
- u32 tile_mode, u32 tile_flags);
+struct nouveau_bo *nouveau_bo_alloc(struct nouveau_cli *, u64 *size, int *align,
+ u32 flags, u32 tile_mode, u32 tile_flags);
int nouveau_bo_init(struct nouveau_bo *, u64 size, int align, u32 flags,
struct sg_table *sg, struct dma_resv *robj);
int nouveau_bo_new(struct nouveau_cli *, u64 size, int align, u32 flags,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index c2bfc0591909..1bdffd714456 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -188,7 +188,8 @@ nouveau_gem_new(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, int align, uint32_t domain,
if (domain & NOUVEAU_GEM_DOMAIN_COHERENT)
flags |= TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED;
- nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, size, flags, tile_mode, tile_flags);
+ nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(cli, &size, &align, flags, tile_mode,
+ tile_flags);
if (IS_ERR(nvbo))
return PTR_ERR(nvbo);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c
index 84658d434225..656c334ee7d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c
@@ -62,14 +62,15 @@ struct drm_gem_object *nouveau_gem_prime_import_sg_table(struct drm_device *dev,
struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev);
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
struct dma_resv *robj = attach->dmabuf->resv;
- size_t size = attach->dmabuf->size;
+ u64 size = attach->dmabuf->size;
u32 flags = 0;
+ int align = 0;
int ret;
flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_TT;
dma_resv_lock(robj, NULL);
- nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(&drm->client, size, flags, 0, 0);
+ nvbo = nouveau_bo_alloc(&drm->client, &size, &align, flags, 0, 0);
dma_resv_unlock(robj);
if (IS_ERR(nvbo))
return ERR_CAST(nvbo);
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *nouveau_gem_prime_import_sg_table(struct drm_device *dev,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
- ret = nouveau_bo_init(nvbo, size, 0, flags, sg, robj);
+ ret = nouveau_bo_init(nvbo, size, align, flags, sg, robj);
if (ret) {
nouveau_bo_ref(NULL, &nvbo);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20190910/28f39176/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list