[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Extend MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Sep 17 11:06:05 UTC 2019
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-09-17 11:56:40)
> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
> > On Tigerlake, MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT grew an extra dword, so be sure to
> > update the length field and emit that extra parameter and any padding
> > noop as required.
> >
> > v2: Define the token shift while we are adding the updated MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gpu_commands.h | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 21 ++++--
> > 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gpu_commands.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gpu_commands.h
> > index fbad403ab7ac..da2025bc332c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gpu_commands.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gpu_commands.h
> > @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL MI_INSTR(0x1b, 0) /* GEN8+ */
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(engine) ((engine)<<15)
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT MI_INSTR(0x1c, 2) /* GEN8+ */
> > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_TOKEN MI_INSTR(0x1c, 3) /* GEN12+ */
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL (1 << 15)
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GT_SDD (0 << 12)
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD (1 << 12)
> > @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_LTE_SDD (3 << 12)
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_EQ_SDD (4 << 12)
> > #define MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_NEQ_SDD (5 << 12)
> > +#define MI_SEMAPHORE_TOKEN_SHIFT 5
>
> Do we need a mask too?
Michal didn't ask for a mask, just that they were using the shift.
> > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM MI_INSTR(0x20, 1)
> > #define MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4 MI_INSTR(0x20, 2)
> > #define MI_MEM_VIRTUAL (1 << 22) /* 945,g33,965 */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> > index 64fa2db5905f..c74fc75e4980 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -3237,6 +3237,22 @@ static u32 *gen8_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
> > return gen8_emit_fini_breadcrumb_footer(request, cs);
> > }
> >
> > +static u32 *
> > +gen11_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
> > +{
> > + cs = gen8_emit_ggtt_write_rcs(cs,
> > + request->fence.seqno,
> > + request->timeline->hwsp_offset,
> > + PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL |
> > + PIPE_CONTROL_TILE_CACHE_FLUSH |
> > + PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH |
> > + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH |
> > + PIPE_CONTROL_DC_FLUSH_ENABLE |
> > + PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE);
> > +
> > + return gen8_emit_fini_breadcrumb_footer(request, cs);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Note that the CS instruction pre-parser will not stall on the breadcrumb
> > * flush and will continue pre-fetching the instructions after it before the
> > @@ -3255,8 +3271,49 @@ static u32 *gen8_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
> > * All the above applies only to the instructions themselves. Non-inline data
> > * used by the instructions is not pre-fetched.
> > */
> > -static u32 *gen11_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *request,
> > - u32 *cs)
> > +
> > +static u32 *gen12_emit_preempt_busywait(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
> > +{
> > + *cs++ = MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT_TOKEN |
> > + MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT |
> > + MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL |
> > + MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_EQ_SDD;
> > + *cs++ = 0;
> > + *cs++ = intel_hws_preempt_address(request->engine);
>
> This is supposed to be in canonical form.
>
> > + *cs++ = 0;
All upper bits are 0. Canonical form is correct :)
> > + *cs++ = 0;
> > + *cs++ = MI_NOOP;
> > +
> > + return cs;
> > +}
> > +static u32 *
> > +gen12_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *request, u32 *cs)
> > {
> > cs = gen8_emit_ggtt_write_rcs(cs,
> > request->fence.seqno,
> > @@ -3268,7 +3325,7 @@ static u32 *gen11_emit_fini_breadcrumb_rcs(struct i915_request *request,
> > PIPE_CONTROL_DC_FLUSH_ENABLE |
> > PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE);
> >
> > - return gen8_emit_fini_breadcrumb_footer(request, cs);
> > + return gen12_emit_fini_breadcrumb_footer(request, cs);
> > }
> >
> > static void execlists_park(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > @@ -3297,9 +3354,6 @@ void intel_execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION;
> > }
> >
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 12) /* XXX disabled for debugging */
> > - engine->flags &= ~I915_ENGINE_HAS_SEMAPHORES;
> > -
> > if (engine->class != COPY_ENGINE_CLASS && INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 11)
>
> this is not against tip :)
Close enough :-p
> > @@ -822,13 +828,18 @@ emit_semaphore_wait(struct i915_request *to,
> > * (post-wrap) values than they were expecting (and so wait
> > * forever).
> > */
> > - *cs++ = MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT |
> > - MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT |
> > - MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL |
> > - MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD;
> > + *cs++ = (MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT |
> > + MI_SEMAPHORE_GLOBAL_GTT |
> > + MI_SEMAPHORE_POLL |
> > + MI_SEMAPHORE_SAD_GTE_SDD) +
> > + has_token;
>
> Pls change to int :O
>
> Also, should we just pass the token in anticipation that it will
> be used in future?
We don't yet have a token (ctx->hw_id is buggy and waiting review for
removal), and we are using poll mode not signal; so 0 will do fine.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list