[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_mmap_gtt: Run forked mmap tests on tgl

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Martin Peres (2019-09-17 12:37:25)
> 
> 
> On 17/09/2019 14:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Tigerlake does not seem to be suffering from the same fault as Icelake
> > did, so let the tests run as they should complete within the timeout.
> > 
> > Early tgl results:
> > 
> > basic-small-copy: SUCCESS (1,671s)
> > forked-basic-small-copy: SUCCESS (37,568s)
> > 
> > medium-copy: SUCCESS (3,307s)
> > forked-medium-copy: SUCCESS (76,614s)
> > forked-medium-copy-XY: SUCCESS (203,251s)
> > forked-medium-copy-odd: SUCCESS (204,265s)
> 
> Thanks for checking this out!
> 
> 3 minutes for a subtest is still an eternity... How much lost coverage
> would it be if we did not execute the non-small forked test?

The others check out the partial fencing, which in theory is checked
extensively in the selftests (live_mman). It shouldn't be an issue, but
it was the forked-medium-copy that hit the timeout and so warned us
about icl. ~o~

* starts playing on his tiny fiddle to the tune of EzBench
-Chris