[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/kms: Duct-tape for mode object lifetime checks

Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Tue Sep 17 12:09:35 UTC 2019


commit 4f5368b5541a902f6596558b05f5c21a9770dd32
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Date:   Fri Jun 14 08:17:23 2019 +0200

    drm/kms: Catch mode_object lifetime errors

uncovered a bit a mess in dp drivers. Most drivers (from a quick look,
all except i915) register all the dp stuff in their init code, which
is too early. With CONFIG_DRM_DP_AUX_CHARDEV this will blow up,
because drm_dp_aux_register tries to add a child to a device in sysfs
(the connector) which doesn't even exist yet.

No one seems to have cared thus far. But with the above change I also
moved the setting of dev->registered after the ->load callback, in an
attempt to keep old drivers from hitting any WARN_ON backtraces. But
that moved radeon.ko from the "working, by accident" to "now also
broken" category.

Since this is a huge mess I figured a revert would be simplest. But
this check has already caught issues in i915:

commit 1b9bd09630d4db4827cc04d358a41a16a6bc2cb0
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 20 19:16:57 2019 +0300

    drm/i915: Do not create a new max_bpc prop for MST connectors

Hence I'd like to retain it. Fix the radeon regression by moving the
setting of dev->registered back to were it was, and stop the
backtraces with an explicit check for dev->driver->load.

Everyone else will stay as broken with CONFIG_DRM_DP_AUX_CHARDEV. The
next patch will improve the kerneldoc and add a todo entry for this.

Fixes: 4f5368b5541a ("drm/kms: Catch mode_object lifetime errors")
Cc: Sean Paul <sean at poorly.run>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c         | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
index b634882056c8..0c9978af9f72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
@@ -983,14 +983,14 @@ int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_minors;
 
+	dev->registered = true;
+
 	if (dev->driver->load) {
 		ret = dev->driver->load(dev, flags);
 		if (ret)
 			goto err_minors;
 	}
 
-	dev->registered = true;
-
 	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET))
 		drm_modeset_register_all(dev);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
index c355ba8e6d5d..6a23e36ed4fe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int __drm_mode_object_add(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_object *obj,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	WARN_ON(dev->registered && !obj_free_cb);
+	WARN_ON(!dev->driver->load && dev->registered && !obj_free_cb);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
 	ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.object_idr, register_obj ? obj : NULL,
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void drm_mode_object_register(struct drm_device *dev,
 void drm_mode_object_unregister(struct drm_device *dev,
 				struct drm_mode_object *object)
 {
-	WARN_ON(dev->registered && !object->free_cb);
+	WARN_ON(!dev->driver->load && dev->registered && !object->free_cb);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
 	if (object->id) {
-- 
2.23.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list