[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7 07/10] drm/i915/dsb: function to trigger workload execution of DSB.
Sharma, Shashank
shashank.sharma at intel.com
Thu Sep 19 05:45:00 UTC 2019
On 9/18/2019 1:27 PM, Animesh Manna wrote:
> Batch buffer will be created through dsb-reg-write function which can have
> single/multiple request based on usecase and once the buffer is ready
> commit function will trigger the execution of the batch buffer. All
> the registers will be updated simultaneously.
>
> v1: Initial version.
> v2: Optimized code few places. (Chris)
> v3: USed DRM_ERROR for dsb head/tail programming failure. (Shashank)
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> index 1d6ce36dbad4..cbf7f2c3300c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> @@ -222,3 +222,45 @@ void intel_dsb_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val)
> (DSB_BYTE_EN << DSB_BYTE_EN_SHIFT) |
> i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg);
> }
> +
> +void intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = container_of(dsb, typeof(*crtc), dsb);
> + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> + u32 tail;
> +
> + if (!dsb->free_pos)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!intel_dsb_enable_engine(dsb))
> + goto reset;
> +
> + if (is_dsb_busy(dsb)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("HEAD_PTR write failed - dsb engine is busy.\n");
> + goto reset;
> + }
> + I915_WRITE(DSB_HEAD(pipe, dsb->id), i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma));
> +
> + tail = ALIGN(dsb->free_pos * 4, CACHELINE_BYTES);
> + if (tail > dsb->free_pos * 4)
> + memset(&dsb->cmd_buf[dsb->free_pos], 0,
> + (tail - dsb->free_pos * 4));
> +
> + if (is_dsb_busy(dsb)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("TAIL_PTR write failed - dsb engine is busy.\n");
> + goto reset;
> + }
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DSB execution started - head 0x%x, tail 0x%x\n",
> + i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma), tail);
> + I915_WRITE(DSB_TAIL(pipe, dsb->id), i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma) + tail);
> + if (wait_for(!is_dsb_busy(dsb), 1)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for DSB workload completion.\n");
> + goto reset;
> + }
> +
> +reset:
> + dsb->free_pos = 0;
> + intel_dsb_disable_engine(dsb);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> index d6ced4422814..dca4e632dd3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> @@ -44,5 +44,6 @@ void intel_dsb_put(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
> void intel_dsb_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg, u32 val);
> void intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write(struct intel_dsb *dsb, i915_reg_t reg,
> u32 val);
> +void intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 2dbaa49f5c74..c77b5066d8dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -11687,6 +11687,8 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> #define _DSBSL_INSTANCE_BASE 0x70B00
> #define DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id) (_DSBSL_INSTANCE_BASE + \
> (pipe) * 0x1000 + (id) * 100)
> +#define DSB_HEAD(pipe, id) _MMIO(DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id) + 0x0)
> +#define DSB_TAIL(pipe, id) _MMIO(DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id) + 0x4)
> #define DSB_CTRL(pipe, id) _MMIO(DSBSL_INSTANCE(pipe, id) + 0x8)
> #define DSB_ENABLE (1 << 31)
> #define DSB_STATUS (1 << 0)
As discussed with Jani, I would expect some changes here, but we can do
those in a staged manner. For now, LGTM,
Please feel free to use: Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
<shashank.sharma at intel.com>
Regards
Shashank
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list