[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915/display/icl: HW state readout for transcoder port sync config
Manasi Navare
manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Mon Sep 23 04:43:30 UTC 2019
Hi Ville,
This gave me clean CI results with adding the power well get/put like you suggested,
could you please review this patch?
Regards
Manasi
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 10:08:04AM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> After the state is committed, we readout the HW registers and compare
> the HW state with the SW state that we just committed.
> For Transcdoer port sync, we add master_transcoder and the
> salves bitmask to the crtc_state, hence we need to read those during
> the HW state readout to avoid pipe state mismatch.
>
> v4:
> * Get power domains in master loop for get_config (Ville)
> v3:
> * Add TRANSCODER_D (Maarten)
> * v3 Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> v2:
> * Add Transcoder_D and MISSING_CASE (Maarten)
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 1ae5eafe2892..711987eb4e9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -10470,6 +10470,72 @@ static void haswell_get_ddi_port_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> }
> }
>
> +static enum transcoder transcoder_master(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> +{
> + u32 trans_port_sync, master_select;
> +
> + trans_port_sync = I915_READ(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL2(cpu_transcoder));
> +
> + if ((trans_port_sync & PORT_SYNC_MODE_ENABLE) == 0)
> + return INVALID_TRANSCODER;
> +
> + master_select = trans_port_sync &
> + PORT_SYNC_MODE_MASTER_SELECT_MASK;
> + switch (master_select) {
> + case 1:
> + return TRANSCODER_A;
> + case 2:
> + return TRANSCODER_B;
> + case 3:
> + return TRANSCODER_C;
> + case 4:
> + return TRANSCODER_D;
> + default:
> + MISSING_CASE(master_select);
> + }
> +
> + return INVALID_TRANSCODER;
> +}
> +
> +static void icelake_get_trans_port_sync_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> + u32 transcoders;
> + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder;
> +
> + pipe_config->master_transcoder = transcoder_master(dev_priv,
> + pipe_config->cpu_transcoder);
> + if (pipe_config->master_transcoder != INVALID_TRANSCODER) {
> + pipe_config->sync_mode_slaves_mask = 0;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + transcoders = BIT(TRANSCODER_A) |
> + BIT(TRANSCODER_B) |
> + BIT(TRANSCODER_C) |
> + BIT(TRANSCODER_D);
> + for_each_cpu_transcoder_masked(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder, transcoders) {
> + enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> + intel_wakeref_t trans_wakeref;
> +
> + power_domain = POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(cpu_transcoder);
> + trans_wakeref = intel_display_power_get_if_enabled(dev_priv,
> + power_domain);
> +
> + if (!trans_wakeref)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (transcoder_master(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder) ==
> + pipe_config->cpu_transcoder)
> + pipe_config->sync_mode_slaves_mask |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
> +
> + intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain, trans_wakeref);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> {
> @@ -10566,6 +10632,9 @@ static bool haswell_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> pipe_config->pixel_multiplier = 1;
> }
>
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> + icelake_get_trans_port_sync_config(crtc, pipe_config);
> +
> out:
> for_each_power_domain(power_domain, power_domain_mask)
> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> --
> 2.19.1
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list