[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor -EIO markup of hung requests
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Mon Sep 23 07:47:18 UTC 2019
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Pull setting -EIO on the hung requests into its own utility function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 1a2b71157f08..53e823d36b28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,13 @@ static void execlists_init_reg_state(u32 *reg_state,
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> struct intel_ring *ring);
>
> +static void mark_eio(struct i915_request *rq)
> +{
> + if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
> + dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
> + i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
> +}
> +
> static inline u32 intel_hws_preempt_address(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> return (i915_ggtt_offset(engine->status_page.vma) +
> @@ -2501,12 +2508,8 @@ static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> __execlists_reset(engine, true);
>
> /* Mark all executing requests as skipped. */
> - list_for_each_entry(rq, &engine->active.requests, sched.link) {
> - if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
> - dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
> -
> - i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
> - }
> + list_for_each_entry(rq, &engine->active.requests, sched.link)
> + mark_eio(rq);
>
> /* Flush the queued requests to the timeline list (for retiring). */
> while ((rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->queue))) {
> @@ -2514,10 +2517,8 @@ static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> int i;
>
> priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
> - list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
> + mark_eio(rq);
> __i915_request_submit(rq);
> - dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
> - i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
Now we marek complete before submitting. Does that bring problems?
-Mika
> }
>
> rb_erase_cached(&p->node, &execlists->queue);
> @@ -2533,13 +2534,14 @@ static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
>
> spin_lock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> - if (ve->request) {
> - ve->request->engine = engine;
> - __i915_request_submit(ve->request);
> - dma_fence_set_error(&ve->request->fence, -EIO);
> - i915_request_mark_complete(ve->request);
> + rq = fetch_and_zero(&ve->request);
> + if (rq) {
> + mark_eio(rq);
> +
> + rq->engine = engine;
> + __i915_request_submit(rq);
> +
> ve->base.execlists.queue_priority_hint = INT_MIN;
> - ve->request = NULL;
> }
> spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
> }
> --
> 2.23.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list