[Intel-gfx] [PATCH V2 6/8] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops

Alex Williamson alex.williamson at redhat.com
Mon Sep 30 21:36:01 UTC 2019


On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:25:13 +0000
Parav Pandit <parav at mellanox.com> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 6:07 PM
> > To: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> > Cc: kvm at vger.kernel.org; linux-s390 at vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel at vger.kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-
> > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gvt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org;
> > kwankhede at nvidia.com; mst at redhat.com; tiwei.bie at intel.com;
> > virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; netdev at vger.kernel.org;
> > cohuck at redhat.com; maxime.coquelin at redhat.com;
> > cunming.liang at intel.com; zhihong.wang at intel.com;
> > rob.miller at broadcom.com; xiao.w.wang at intel.com;
> > haotian.wang at sifive.com; zhenyuw at linux.intel.com; zhi.a.wang at intel.com;
> > jani.nikula at linux.intel.com; joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com;
> > rodrigo.vivi at intel.com; airlied at linux.ie; daniel at ffwll.ch;
> > farman at linux.ibm.com; pasic at linux.ibm.com; sebott at linux.ibm.com;
> > oberpar at linux.ibm.com; heiko.carstens at de.ibm.com; gor at linux.ibm.com;
> > borntraeger at de.ibm.com; akrowiak at linux.ibm.com; freude at linux.ibm.com;
> > lingshan.zhu at intel.com; Ido Shamay <idos at mellanox.com>;
> > eperezma at redhat.com; lulu at redhat.com; Parav Pandit
> > <parav at mellanox.com>; christophe.de.dinechin at gmail.com;
> > kevin.tian at intel.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/8] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops
> > 
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:53:30 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > This patch implements basic support for mdev driver that supports
> > > virtio transport for kernel virtio driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/mdev.h        |   2 +
> > >  include/linux/virtio_mdev.h | 145
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 147 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_mdev.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mdev.h b/include/linux/mdev.h index
> > > 3414307311f1..73ac27b3b868 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mdev.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mdev.h
> > > @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ struct mdev_device *mdev_from_dev(struct device
> > > *dev);
> > >
> > >  enum {
> > >  	MDEV_ID_VFIO = 1,
> > > +	MDEV_ID_VIRTIO = 2,
> > > +	MDEV_ID_VHOST = 3,  
> > 
> > MDEV_ID_VHOST isn't used yet here.  Also, given the strong interdependence
> > between the class_id and the ops structure, we might wand to define them in
> > the same place.  Thanks,
> >   
> 
> When mlx5_core creates mdevs (parent->ops->create() and it wants to
> bind to mlx5 mdev driver (which does mdev_register_driver()), mlx5
> core driver will publish MDEV_ID_MLX5_NET defined in central place as
> include/linux/mdev.h without any ops structure. Because such ops are
> not relevant. It uses usual, standard ops probe() remove() on the
> mdev (similar to a regular PCI device). So for VHOST case ops may be
> closely related to ID, but not for other type of ID.
> 
> Just want to make sure, that scope of ID covers this case.

AIUI, these device-ops are primarily meant to have 1:N multiplexing of
the mdev bus driver.  One mdev bus driver supports N vendor drivers via
a common "protocol" defined by this structure.  vfio-mdev supports
GVT-g, GRID, and several sample drivers.  I think Jason and Tiwei are
attempting something similar if we have multiple vendors that may
provide virtio/vhost parent drivers.  If you have a 1:1 model with
mlx5 where you're not trying to abstract a common channel between the
mdev bus driver and the mdev vendor driver, then I suppose you might
not use the device-ops capabilities of the mdev-core.  Did I interpret
the question correctly?  I think that's probably fine, mdev-core
shouldn't have any dependencies on the device-ops and we shouldn't
really be dictating the bus/vendor link through mdev.  Thanks,

Alex


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list