[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] i915/perf: 32bit printf cleanup

[Lionel Landwerlin]

On 20/08/2020 20:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Use PRI[du]64 as necessary for 32bit builds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>


Thanks!

-Lionel

> ---
>   tests/i915/perf.c                    | 8 ++++----
>   tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/perf.c b/tests/i915/perf.c
> index 92edc9f1f..a894fd382 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/perf.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/perf.c
> @@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ test_blocking(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ke
>   	user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
>   	kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
>   
> -	igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> +	igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
>   		  n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
>   	igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. context switches)\n",
>   		  n_extra_iterations);
> @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ test_polling(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ker
>   	user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
>   	kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
>   
> -	igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> +	igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
>   		  n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
>   	igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. context switches)\n",
>   		  n_extra_iterations);
> @@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
>   	int64_t start, end;
>   	int num_reports = 0;
>   
> -	igt_debug("Expected duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
> +	igt_debug("Expected duration = %"PRId64"\n", *duration_ns);
>   
>   	stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, param, true);
>   
> @@ -2389,7 +2389,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
>   
>   	*duration_ns = end - start;
>   
> -	igt_debug("Actual duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
> +	igt_debug("Actual duration = %"PRIu64"\n", *duration_ns);
>   
>   	return num_reports;
>   }
> diff --git a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> index 7671f39b4..adc41c29f 100644
> --- a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> +++ b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   	}
>   
>   	ctx.oa_exponent = oa_exponent_for_period(ctx.timestamp_frequency, perf_period);
> -	fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%lu oa_exponent=%u\n",
> +	fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%"PRIu64" oa_exponent=%u\n",
>   		ctx.metric_set->perf_oa_metrics_set, ctx.oa_exponent);
>   
>   	ctx.perf_fd = perf_open(&ctx);