[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/4] i915/perf: 32bit printf cleanup

[Petri Latvala]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:45:23AM +0300, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 20/08/2020 20:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Use PRI[du]64 as necessary for 32bit builds.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> 

Was this for just 1/4 or the whole series?

This one is for the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>



> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Lionel
> 
> > ---
> >   tests/i915/perf.c                    | 8 ++++----
> >   tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c | 2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/perf.c b/tests/i915/perf.c
> > index 92edc9f1f..a894fd382 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/perf.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/perf.c
> > @@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ test_blocking(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ke
> >   	user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
> >   	kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
> > -	igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> > +	igt_debug("%d blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> >   		  n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
> >   	igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. context switches)\n",
> >   		  n_extra_iterations);
> > @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ test_polling(uint64_t requested_oa_period, bool set_kernel_hrtimer, uint64_t ker
> >   	user_ns = (end_times.tms_utime - start_times.tms_utime) * tick_ns;
> >   	kernel_ns = (end_times.tms_stime - start_times.tms_stime) * tick_ns;
> > -	igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %lu Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> > +	igt_debug("%d non-blocking reads during test with %"PRIu64" Hz OA sampling (expect no more than %d)\n",
> >   		  n, NSEC_PER_SEC / oa_period, max_iterations);
> >   	igt_debug("%d extra iterations seen, not related to periodic sampling (e.g. context switches)\n",
> >   		  n_extra_iterations);
> > @@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
> >   	int64_t start, end;
> >   	int num_reports = 0;
> > -	igt_debug("Expected duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
> > +	igt_debug("Expected duration = %"PRId64"\n", *duration_ns);
> >   	stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, param, true);
> > @@ -2389,7 +2389,7 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct drm_i915_perf_open_param *param,
> >   	*duration_ns = end - start;
> > -	igt_debug("Actual duration = %lu\n", *duration_ns);
> > +	igt_debug("Actual duration = %"PRIu64"\n", *duration_ns);
> >   	return num_reports;
> >   }
> > diff --git a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> > index 7671f39b4..adc41c29f 100644
> > --- a/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> > +++ b/tools/i915-perf/i915_perf_recorder.c
> > @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
> >   	}
> >   	ctx.oa_exponent = oa_exponent_for_period(ctx.timestamp_frequency, perf_period);
> > -	fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%lu oa_exponent=%u\n",
> > +	fprintf(stdout, "Opening perf stream with metric_id=%"PRIu64" oa_exponent=%u\n",
> >   		ctx.metric_set->perf_oa_metrics_set, ctx.oa_exponent);
> >   	ctx.perf_fd = perf_open(&ctx);
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev