[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection
Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com
Thu Dec 3 11:07:40 UTC 2020
+ Jaswant
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
> Sent: 03 December 2020 09:44
> To: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>; Pandey, Hariom
> <hariom.pandey at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe
> protection
>
> Hi Jaswant,
>
> Can you please re-run resume run on CI as well as local setup and share
> results here? If it passes in full resume run in either of setup we are good go
> with.
>
> Thanks,
> Tejas
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Sent: 30 November 2020 20:31
> > To: Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey at intel.com>; Surendrakumar
> Upadhyay,
> > TejaskumarX <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com>; intel-
> > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove
> > require_force_probe protection
> >
> > Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-11-30 14:45:14)
> > > Hi Chris,
> > >
> > > The failing test was not part of BAT run, it ran in CI resume run
> > > and failed
> > there, however on manual run the same test got passed. Please find
> > attached results.
> >
> > One pass versus a major failure is not satisfactory.
> >
> > We can not say we are happy with the hardware/driver until it is
> > reliable, and forcewake is of fundamental importance for mmio access,
> > as well as execution.
> > -Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list