[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Jan 20 11:36:42 UTC 2020
The principle under test is that we fill the ring and the kernel waits
rather than overrun the ring buffer. We only need one test to exercise
that basic behaviour in BAT.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
index 8c574d910..40d273c1d 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
@@ -39,10 +39,7 @@ igt at gem_mmap@basic
igt at gem_mmap_gtt@basic
igt at gem_render_linear_blits@basic
igt at gem_render_tiled_blits@basic
-igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default
-igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-interruptible
igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked
-igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd
igt at gem_sync@basic-all
igt at gem_sync@basic-each
igt at gem_tiled_blits@basic
--
2.25.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list