[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] intel-ci: Use one ringfull example

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> The principle under test is that we fill the ring and the kernel waits
> rather than overrun the ring buffer. We only need one test to exercise
> that basic behaviour in BAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index 8c574d910..40d273c1d 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -39,10 +39,7 @@ igt at gem_mmap@basic
>  igt at gem_mmap_gtt@basic
>  igt at gem_render_linear_blits@basic
>  igt at gem_render_tiled_blits@basic
> -igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default
> -igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-interruptible
>  igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-forked
> -igt at gem_ringfill@basic-default-fd
>  igt at gem_sync@basic-all
>  igt at gem_sync@basic-each
>  igt at gem_tiled_blits@basic
> -- 
> 2.25.0