[Intel-gfx] [RFC 00/33] drm/i915/display: mass conversion to intel_de_*() register accessors

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2020, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:54:58PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-01-24 13:25:21)
>> > Hey all,
>> > 
>> > So I sent [1] to convert some forcewake register accessors... but what if we
>> > just ripped off the bandage once and for all? It's going to hurt, a lot, but
>> > we'd get it done.
>> > 
>> > This completely rids us of the "dev_priv" dependency in display/.
>> > 
>> > All the patches here are per-file and independent of each other. We could also
>> > pick and apply the ones that are least likely to conflict.
>> > 
>> > Opinions?
>> > 
>> > 
>> > BR,
>> > Jani.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > PS. I didn't bother looking at the checkpatch warnings this may generate at this
>> > point. I just used the --linux-spacing option for spatch, and closed my eyes. I
>> > completely scripted the generation of the series, apart from just a couple of
>> > build fixes.
>> 
>> Yup. Suck it all in, clean up with the usual code refreshes.
>> Schadenfreude-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> 
>> I've looked at a couple of patches to confirm that it does appear purely
>> mechanical,
>> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> Since it is purely mechanical with coccinelle, why not to make in only one patch?

Because such a mega patch would conflict before being able to
merge. You'd have to block everything else. I don't think I'd be able to
merge these in one go either even if we wanted to.

> Anyway:
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>

Thanks,
Jani.

>
>> -Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center