[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/dsb: Replace HAS_DSB check with dsb->cmd_buf check

[Sharma, Swati2]

Hi Ville,

Can you please rebase on current drm-tip and submit new revision so that 
new run can be executed? BAT failure was observed with the last revision
submitted.

On 29-Jan-20 11:50 PM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> 
> We may want to not use the DSB even if the platform has one.
> So replace the HAS_DSB check in the _put() with a cmd_buf check
> that will work in either case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> index 9dd18144a664..12776f09f227 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> @@ -160,9 +160,8 @@ intel_dsb_get(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>   void intel_dsb_put(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
>   {
>   	struct intel_crtc *crtc = container_of(dsb, typeof(*crtc), dsb);
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>   
> -	if (!HAS_DSB(i915))
> +	if (!dsb->cmd_buf)
>   		return;
>   
>   	if (WARN_ON(dsb->refcount == 0))
> 

-- 
~Swati Sharma