[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/i915/dp: Register definition for DP compliance register

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Mar 19 16:02:22 UTC 2020


On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:09:18PM +0530, Manna, Animesh wrote:
> On 19-03-2020 01:34, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:05:14PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> >> DP_COMP_CTL and DP_COMP_PAT register used to program DP
> >> compliance pattern.
> >>
> >> v1: Initial patch.
> >> v2: used pipe instead of port in macro definition. [Manasi]
> >> v3: used trans_offset for offset calculation. [Manasi]
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >> index 309cb7d96b35..8b6c9fbfe74b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >> @@ -9792,6 +9792,22 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> >>   #define  DDI_BUF_BALANCE_LEG_ENABLE	(1 << 31)
> >>   #define DDI_BUF_TRANS_HI(port, i)	_MMIO(_PORT(port, _DDI_BUF_TRANS_A, _DDI_BUF_TRANS_B) + (i) * 8 + 4)
> >>   
> >> +/* DDI DP Compliance Control */
> >> +#define _DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_A			0x605F0
> >> +#define DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(pipe)			_MMIO_TRANS2(pipe, _DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_A)
> > Any reason why you couldnt use _MMIO_PIPE2 ?
> 
> As DP_COMP_CTL is part of transcoder register group, so I choose _MMIO_TRANS2 for calculation. Yes _MMIO_PIPE2 will also work as the offset difference between subsequent pipe is same (0x1000).

The preference is:
1. _MMIO_PIPE()/etc. for evenly spaced things
2. _MMIO_PIPE2()/etc. for regular but not evenly spaced stuff
3. _PICK() where the above two fail

There are probably a few places that do violate that though.
We should probably fix those to not give people the wrong ideas.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list