[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix glk watermark calculations
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed May 6 13:28:16 UTC 2020
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:17:20PM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 03:58:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > GLK wants the +1 adjustement for the "blocks per line" value
> > for x-tile/y-tile, just like cnl+.
> >
> > Also the x-tile and linear cases are almost identical. The only
> > difference is this +1 which is always done for glk+, and only
> > done for linear on skl/bxt. Let's unify it to a single branch
> > with a special case for the +1, just like we do for y-tile.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index bfb180fe8047..65a3236ce277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -4810,7 +4810,7 @@ skl_wm_method1(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pixel_rate,
> > wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate * cpp;
> > ret = div_fixed16(wm_intermediate_val, 1000 * dbuf_block_size);
> >
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > ret = add_fixed16_u32(ret, 1);
> >
> > return ret;
> > @@ -4945,18 +4945,19 @@ skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > wp->y_min_scanlines,
> > wp->dbuf_block_size);
> >
> > - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10)
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > interm_pbpl++;
> >
> > wp->plane_blocks_per_line = div_fixed16(interm_pbpl,
> > wp->y_min_scanlines);
> > - } else if (wp->x_tiled && IS_GEN(dev_priv, 9)) {
> > - interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(wp->plane_bytes_per_line,
> > - wp->dbuf_block_size);
> > - wp->plane_blocks_per_line = u32_to_fixed16(interm_pbpl);
> > } else {
> > interm_pbpl = DIV_ROUND_UP(wp->plane_bytes_per_line,
> > - wp->dbuf_block_size) + 1;
> > + wp->dbuf_block_size);
> > +
> > + if (!wp->x_tiled ||
> > + INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > + interm_pbpl++;
> > +
>
> Is it so that we want +1 here only for x-tile,y-tile for GLK?
> Because I guess if you have linear mapping and GLK, this will do +1 as well.
glk+ always wants the +1.
pre-glk wants +1 only for linear.
>
> With this clarified,
>
> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
>
> > wp->plane_blocks_per_line = u32_to_fixed16(interm_pbpl);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.24.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list