[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 06/12] drm/i915: Try to make bigjoiner work in atomic check

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Oct 23 17:42:00 UTC 2020


On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:42:17PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> 
>  When the clock is higher than the dotclock, try with 2 pipes enabled.
>  If we can enable 2, then we will go into big joiner mode, and steal
>  the adjacent crtc.
> 
>  This only links the crtc's in software, no hardware or plane
>  programming is done yet. Blobs are also copied from the master's
>  crtc_state, so it doesn't depend at commit time on the other
>  crtc_state.
> 
> v4:
> * Fixes in intel_crtc_compute_config (Ville)
> v3:
> * Manual Rebase (Manasi)
>  Changes since v1:
>  - Rename pipe timings to transcoder timings, as they are now different.
>   Changes since v2:
>  - Rework bigjoiner checks; always disable slave when recalculating
>    master. No need to have a separate bigjoiner pass any more.
>  - Use pipe_mode instead of transcoder_mode, to clean up the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  | 181 ++++++++++++++++--
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |   9 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       |  22 ++-
>  3 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 92cd38964142..ffee6afe4ddb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -8237,9 +8237,24 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  				     struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> -	const struct drm_display_mode *pipe_mode = &pipe_config->hw.pipe_mode;
> +	struct drm_display_mode *pipe_mode = &pipe_config->hw.pipe_mode;
>  	int clock_limit = dev_priv->max_dotclk_freq;
>  
> +	*pipe_mode = pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +
> +	/* Adjust pipe_mode for bigjoiner, with half the horizontal mode */
> +	if (pipe_config->bigjoiner) {
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_clock /= 2;
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay /= 2;
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hblank_start /= 2;
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hblank_end /= 2;
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_start /= 2;
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_end /= 2;
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_htotal /= 2;
> +		pipe_mode->crtc_hskew /= 2;
> +		pipe_config->pipe_src_w /= 2;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 4) {
>  		clock_limit = dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq * 9 / 10;
>  
> @@ -8300,7 +8315,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  	 * WaPruneModeWithIncorrectHsyncOffset:ctg,elk,ilk,snb,ivb,vlv,hsw.
>  	 */
>  	if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) > 4 || IS_G4X(dev_priv)) &&
> -		pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_start == pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay)
> +	    pipe_mode->crtc_hsync_start == pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate(pipe_config);
> @@ -12657,7 +12672,7 @@ static bool encoders_cloneable(const struct intel_encoder *a,
>  			  b->cloneable & (1 << a->type));
>  }
>  
> -static bool check_single_encoder_cloning(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> +static bool check_single_encoder_cloning(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  					 struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  					 struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  {
> @@ -12666,7 +12681,7 @@ static bool check_single_encoder_cloning(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  	struct drm_connector_state *connector_state;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, connector_state, i) {
> +	for_each_new_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector, connector_state, i) {

There's still this extra noise in the patch. I thought you were going
to split out the calling convention changes to reduce it?

>  		if (connector_state->crtc != &crtc->base)
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -12906,6 +12921,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	if (mode_changed && crtc_state->hw.enable &&
>  	    dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock &&
> +	    !crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave &&
>  	    !drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc_state->shared_dpll)) {
>  		ret = dev_priv->display.crtc_compute_clock(crtc, crtc_state);
>  		if (ret)
> @@ -13447,6 +13463,15 @@ intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state_nomodeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  {
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *from_crtc_state = crtc_state;
>  
> +	if (crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
> +		from_crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
> +								  crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
> +
> +		/* No need to copy state if the master state is unchanged */
> +		if (!from_crtc_state)
> +			return;
> +	}
> +
>  	intel_crtc_copy_color_blobs(crtc_state, from_crtc_state);
>  }
>  
> @@ -13482,6 +13507,47 @@ static void intel_crtc_copy_hw_to_uapi_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state
>  				  crtc_state->hw.ctm);
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +			  const struct intel_crtc_state *from_crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *saved_state;
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> +
> +	saved_state = kmemdup(from_crtc_state, sizeof(*saved_state), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!saved_state)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	saved_state->uapi = crtc_state->uapi;
> +	saved_state->scaler_state = crtc_state->scaler_state;
> +	saved_state->shared_dpll = crtc_state->shared_dpll;
> +	saved_state->dpll_hw_state = crtc_state->dpll_hw_state;
> +	saved_state->crc_enabled = crtc_state->crc_enabled;
> +
> +	intel_crtc_free_hw_state(crtc_state);
> +	memcpy(crtc_state, saved_state, sizeof(*crtc_state));
> +	kfree(saved_state);
> +
> +	/* Re-init hw state */
> +	memset(&crtc_state->hw, 0, sizeof(saved_state->hw));
> +	crtc_state->hw.enable = from_crtc_state->hw.enable;
> +	crtc_state->hw.active = from_crtc_state->hw.active;
> +	crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode = from_crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode;
> +	crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode = from_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> +
> +	/* Some fixups */
> +	crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = from_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed;
> +	crtc_state->uapi.connectors_changed = from_crtc_state->uapi.connectors_changed;
> +	crtc_state->uapi.active_changed = from_crtc_state->uapi.active_changed;
> +	crtc_state->nv12_planes = crtc_state->c8_planes = crtc_state->update_planes = 0;
> +	crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = to_intel_crtc(from_crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> +	crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = true;
> +	crtc_state->cpu_transcoder = (enum transcoder)crtc->pipe;
> +	crtc_state->has_audio = false;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  				 struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> @@ -13522,10 +13588,10 @@ intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -intel_modeset_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
> +intel_modeset_pipe_config(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +			  struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>  {
>  	struct drm_crtc *crtc = pipe_config->uapi.crtc;
> -	struct drm_atomic_state *state = pipe_config->uapi.state;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(pipe_config->uapi.crtc->dev);
>  	struct drm_connector *connector;
>  	struct drm_connector_state *connector_state;
> @@ -13567,7 +13633,7 @@ intel_modeset_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>  			       &pipe_config->pipe_src_w,
>  			       &pipe_config->pipe_src_h);
>  
> -	for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, connector_state, i) {
> +	for_each_new_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector, connector_state, i) {
>  		struct intel_encoder *encoder =
>  			to_intel_encoder(connector_state->best_encoder);
>  
> @@ -13605,7 +13671,7 @@ intel_modeset_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>  	 * adjust it according to limitations or connector properties, and also
>  	 * a chance to reject the mode entirely.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_new_connector_in_state(state, connector, connector_state, i) {
> +	for_each_new_connector_in_state(&state->base, connector, connector_state, i) {
>  		struct intel_encoder *encoder =
>  			to_intel_encoder(connector_state->best_encoder);
>  
> @@ -13657,9 +13723,6 @@ intel_modeset_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>  		    "hw max bpp: %i, pipe bpp: %i, dithering: %i\n",
>  		    base_bpp, pipe_config->pipe_bpp, pipe_config->dither);
>  
> -	/* without bigjoiner, pipe_mode == adjusted_mode */
> -	pipe_config->hw.pipe_mode = pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -15055,6 +15118,75 @@ static bool intel_cpu_transcoders_need_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static int intel_atomic_check_bigjoiner(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +					struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> +					struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> +					struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state, *master_crtc_state;
> +	struct intel_crtc *slave, *master;
> +
> +	/* slave being enabled, is master is still claiming this crtc? */
> +	if (old_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
> +		slave = crtc;
> +		master = old_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
> +		master_crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, master);
> +		if (!master_crtc_state || !needs_modeset(master_crtc_state))
> +			goto claimed;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (1 + crtc->pipe >= INTEL_NUM_PIPES(dev_priv)) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CRTC:%d:%s] Big joiner configuration requires "
> +			      "CRTC + 1 to be used, doesn't exist\n",
> +			      crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	slave = new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc =
> +		intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, crtc->pipe + 1);
> +	slave_crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(&state->base, slave);
> +	master = crtc;
> +	if (IS_ERR(slave_crtc_state))
> +		return PTR_ERR(slave_crtc_state);
> +
> +	/* master being enabled, slave was already configured? */
> +	if (slave_crtc_state->uapi.enable)
> +		goto claimed;
> +
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CRTC:%d:%s] Used as slave for big joiner\n",
> +		      slave->base.base.id, slave->base.name);
> +
> +	return copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state(slave_crtc_state, new_crtc_state);
> +
> +claimed:
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CRTC:%d:%s] Slave is enabled as normal CRTC, but "
> +		      "[CRTC:%d:%s] claiming this CRTC for bigjoiner.\n",
> +		      slave->base.base.id, slave->base.name,
> +		      master->base.base.id, master->base.name);
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int kill_bigjoiner_slave(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> +			intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(&state->base,
> +						    master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR(slave_crtc_state))
> +			return PTR_ERR(slave_crtc_state);
> +
> +		slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner = false;
> +		slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = false;
> +		slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = NULL;
> +		intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state(state, slave_crtc_state);
> +		return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * DOC: asynchronous flip implementation
>   *
> @@ -15222,14 +15354,31 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> +		/* Kill old bigjoiner link, we may re-establish afterwards */
> +		if (old_crtc_state->bigjoiner && !old_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
> +			ret = kill_bigjoiner_slave(state, new_crtc_state);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!new_crtc_state->uapi.enable) {
> +			if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
> +				intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state(state, new_crtc_state);
> +				any_ms = true;
> +			}
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
>  		ret = intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state(state, new_crtc_state);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto fail;
>  
> -		if (!new_crtc_state->hw.enable)
> -			continue;
> +		ret = intel_modeset_pipe_config(state, new_crtc_state);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto fail;
>  
> -		ret = intel_modeset_pipe_config(new_crtc_state);
> +		ret = intel_atomic_check_bigjoiner(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> +						   new_crtc_state);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto fail;
>  	}
> @@ -15567,7 +15716,9 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	commit_pipe_config(state, crtc);
>  
> -	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
> +	if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner) {
> +	/* Not supported yet */
> +	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>  		skl_update_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
>  	else
>  		i9xx_update_planes_on_crtc(state, crtc);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index b526afee595c..59ed94d68b55 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,15 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
>  	/* enable pipe csc? */
>  	bool csc_enable;
>  
> +	/* enable pipe big joiner? */
> +	bool bigjoiner;
> +
> +	/* big joiner slave crtc? */
> +	bool bigjoiner_slave;
> +
> +	/* linked crtc for bigjoiner, either slave or master */
> +	struct intel_crtc *bigjoiner_linked_crtc;
> +
>  	/* Display Stream compression state */
>  	struct {
>  		bool compression_enable;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index d123e5a508c1..cb604899a881 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2349,6 +2349,15 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	pipe_config->port_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[limits->max_clock];
>  	pipe_config->lane_count = limits->max_lane_count;
>  
> +	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock > intel_dp_max_dotclock(intel_dp, false)) {
> +		if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock > intel_dp_max_dotclock(intel_dp, true)) {
> +			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Clock rate too high for big joiner\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}

That second check is redundant I think. intel_crtc_compute_config()
already takes care of it.

So seems like we should be good with just something super simple like:

if (crtc_clock > dev_priv->max_dotclock && can_bigjoiner())
	bigjoiner = true;


> +		pipe_config->bigjoiner = true;
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using bigjoiner configuration\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>  		pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp =
>  			min_t(u16, drm_edp_dsc_sink_output_bpp(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd) >> 4,
> @@ -2366,12 +2375,12 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  						    pipe_config->lane_count,
>  						    adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>  						    adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> -						    false);
> +						    pipe_config->bigjoiner);
>  		dsc_dp_slice_count =
>  			intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
>  						     adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>  						     adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> -						     false);
> +						     pipe_config->bigjoiner);
>  		if (!dsc_max_output_bpp || !dsc_dp_slice_count) {
>  			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>  				    "Compressed BPP/Slice Count not supported\n");
> @@ -2387,14 +2396,15 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	 * is greater than the maximum Cdclock and if slice count is even
>  	 * then we need to use 2 VDSC instances.
>  	 */
> -	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq) {
> -		if (pipe_config->dsc.slice_count > 1) {
> -			pipe_config->dsc.dsc_split = true;
> -		} else {
> +	if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock > dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq ||
> +	    pipe_config->bigjoiner) {
> +		if (pipe_config->dsc.slice_count < 2) {
>  			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>  				    "Cannot split stream to use 2 VDSC instances\n");
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> +
> +		pipe_config->dsc.dsc_split = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_params(&dig_port->base, pipe_config);
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list