[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/57] drm/i915: Wrap access to intel_engine.active
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 4 12:08:15 UTC 2021
On 04/02/2021 11:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-02-04 11:18:29)
>> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-04 11:07:07)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/02/2021 08:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
>>>> index b56e321ef003..280d84c4e4b7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
>>>> @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static int virtual_prio(const struct intel_engine_execlists *el)
>>>> static bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>>>> const struct i915_request *rq)
>>>> {
>>>> + const struct i915_sched *se = &engine->active;
>>>
>>> There's only two instances in this patch which do not use
>>> intel_engine_get_scheduler. Intended?
>>
>> They were the ones I earmarked for being replaced by the scheduler
>> object being passed down. Having down that I can do the replacement here
>> and remove the conflicts with the final result later.
>
> The catch here was the const. We can't make the getter take a const*
> at this point, so I left it as &engine->active to not have to remove the
> constness.
It's fine, I'm mostly interested in the goodness of the end result.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list