[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/29] drm/i915/gem: Add an intermediate proto_context struct
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Thu Jun 3 07:09:23 UTC 2021
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:24 PM Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 3:47 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:26:37AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > The current context uAPI allows for two methods of setting context
> > > parameters: SET_CONTEXT_PARAM and CONTEXT_CREATE_EXT_SETPARAM. The
> > > former is allowed to be called at any time while the later happens as
> > > part of GEM_CONTEXT_CREATE. Currently, everything settable via one is
> > > settable via the other. While some params are fairly simple and setting
> > > them on a live context is harmless such the context priority, others are
> > > far trickier such as the VM or the set of engines. In order to swap out
> > > the VM, for instance, we have to delay until all current in-flight work
> > > is complete, swap in the new VM, and then continue. This leads to a
> > > plethora of potential race conditions we'd really rather avoid.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, both methods of setting the VM and engine set are in
> >
> > ^the
> >
> > At least my English parser jumped there a bit and got confused :-)
>
> I believe what I wrote was correct but I'm happy to tweak it if it
> helps others' parsers.
Hm yeah I think that was just a fluke, leave it as-is.
> > > active use today so we can't simply disallow setting the VM or engine
> > > set vial SET_CONTEXT_PARAM. In order to work around this wart, this
> > > commit adds a proto-context struct which contains all the context create
> > > parameters.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
> >
> > I also looked at my review from the previous round and I think we have a
> > few opens there that haven't been addressed here. Would be nice to check
> > that out too and my reply there if you're disagreeing and want to paint
> > the shed differently :-)
>
> Ok, I'll try to dig it up. I miss GitLab and it's "resolve
> discussion" button so much....
>
> > I've found a few other things needing polish below on top of the earlier
> > bits.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 145 ++++++++++++++----
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h | 22 +++
> > > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_context.c | 16 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> > > index fc471243aa769..10bff488444b6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> > > @@ -191,6 +191,97 @@ static int validate_priority(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void proto_context_close(struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc)
> > > +{
> > > + if (pc->vm)
> > > + i915_vm_put(pc->vm);
> > > + kfree(pc);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int proto_context_set_persistence(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > > + struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc,
> > > + bool persist)
> > > +{
> > > + if (persist) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Only contexts that are short-lived [that will expire or be
> > > + * reset] are allowed to survive past termination. We require
> > > + * hangcheck to ensure that the persistent requests are healthy.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!i915->params.enable_hangcheck)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + __set_bit(UCONTEXT_PERSISTENCE, &pc->user_flags);
> > > + } else {
> > > + /* To cancel a context we use "preempt-to-idle" */
> > > + if (!(i915->caps.scheduler & I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PREEMPTION))
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * If the cancel fails, we then need to reset, cleanly!
> > > + *
> > > + * If the per-engine reset fails, all hope is lost! We resort
> > > + * to a full GPU reset in that unlikely case, but realistically
> > > + * if the engine could not reset, the full reset does not fare
> > > + * much better. The damage has been done.
> > > + *
> > > + * However, if we cannot reset an engine by itself, we cannot
> > > + * cleanup a hanging persistent context without causing
> > > + * colateral damage, and we should not pretend we can by
> > > + * exposing the interface.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!intel_has_reset_engine(&i915->gt))
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + __clear_bit(UCONTEXT_PERSISTENCE, &pc->user_flags);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct i915_gem_proto_context *
> > > +proto_context_create(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
> > > +{
> > > + struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc, *err;
> > > +
> > > + pc = kzalloc(sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!pc)
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > +
> > > + if (HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915)) {
> > > + struct i915_ppgtt *ppgtt;
> > > +
> > > + ppgtt = i915_ppgtt_create(&i915->gt);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(ppgtt)) {
> > > + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "PPGTT setup failed (%ld)\n",
> > > + PTR_ERR(ppgtt));
> > > + err = ERR_CAST(ppgtt);
> > > + goto proto_close;
> > > + }
> > > + pc->vm = &ppgtt->vm;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + pc->user_flags = 0;
> > > + __set_bit(UCONTEXT_BANNABLE, &pc->user_flags);
> > > + __set_bit(UCONTEXT_RECOVERABLE, &pc->user_flags);
> > > + proto_context_set_persistence(i915, pc, true);
> >
> > You've lost the error handling here.
>
> No, I've not. This is where that helper is both wonderful and crazy
> annoying. We could have a helper to check whether or not a particular
> persistence setting is allowed. Instead (and this is what the old
> code does too), it's initialized to false by kzalloc and then we try
> to set it to true and ignore the failure. This ensures that,
> regardless of which options are allowed, we'll end up with an allowed
> one. Yeah, the more I type here the more I realize just how bad of an
> idea that is. :-) If you'd like, we can refactor things to have a
> validation function persistence_setting_valid() or maybe a pair
> requires_persistence() and persistence_allowed(). I'm open to other
> suggestions too.
Oh right, _that_ story. That's even the story I brought up in the
previous round, analyzed there correctly, but totally forgot the
conclusion :-/
-Daniel
>
> > > + pc->sched.priority = I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE) {
> > > + if (!HAS_EXECLISTS(i915)) {
> > > + err = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > + goto proto_close;
> > > + }
> > > + pc->single_timeline = true;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return pc;
> > > +
> > > +proto_close:
> > > + proto_context_close(pc);
> > > + return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static struct i915_address_space *
> > > context_get_vm_rcu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
> > > {
> > > @@ -660,7 +751,8 @@ static int __context_set_persistence(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, bool state)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static struct i915_gem_context *
> > > -__create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > > +__create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > > + const struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc)
> > > {
> > > struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> > > struct i915_gem_engines *e;
> > > @@ -673,7 +765,7 @@ __create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > >
> > > kref_init(&ctx->ref);
> > > ctx->i915 = i915;
> > > - ctx->sched.priority = I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL;
> > > + ctx->sched = pc->sched;
> > > mutex_init(&ctx->mutex);
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->link);
> > >
> > > @@ -696,9 +788,7 @@ __create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > > * is no remap info, it will be a NOP. */
> > > ctx->remap_slice = ALL_L3_SLICES(i915);
> > >
> > > - i915_gem_context_set_bannable(ctx);
> > > - i915_gem_context_set_recoverable(ctx);
> > > - __context_set_persistence(ctx, true /* cgroup hook? */);
> > > + ctx->user_flags = pc->user_flags;
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->hang_timestamp); i++)
> > > ctx->hang_timestamp[i] = jiffies - CONTEXT_FAST_HANG_JIFFIES;
> > > @@ -786,38 +876,23 @@ static void __assign_ppgtt(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> > > }
> > >
> > > static struct i915_gem_context *
> > > -i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags)
> > > +i915_gem_create_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > > + const struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc)
> > > {
> > > struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE &&
> > > - !HAS_EXECLISTS(i915))
> > > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > -
> > > - ctx = __create_context(i915);
> > > + ctx = __create_context(i915, pc);
> > > if (IS_ERR(ctx))
> > > return ctx;
> > >
> > > - if (HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915)) {
> > > - struct i915_ppgtt *ppgtt;
> > > -
> > > - ppgtt = i915_ppgtt_create(&i915->gt);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(ppgtt)) {
> > > - drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "PPGTT setup failed (%ld)\n",
> > > - PTR_ERR(ppgtt));
> > > - context_close(ctx);
> > > - return ERR_CAST(ppgtt);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > + if (pc->vm) {
> > > mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
> > > - __assign_ppgtt(ctx, &ppgtt->vm);
> > > + __assign_ppgtt(ctx, pc->vm);
> > > mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
> > > -
> > > - i915_vm_put(&ppgtt->vm);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE) {
> > > + if (pc->single_timeline) {
> > > ret = drm_syncobj_create(&ctx->syncobj,
> > > DRM_SYNCOBJ_CREATE_SIGNALED,
> > > NULL);
> > > @@ -883,6 +958,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_open(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > > struct drm_file *file)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
> > > + struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc;
> > > struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> > > int err;
> > > u32 id;
> > > @@ -892,7 +968,14 @@ int i915_gem_context_open(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > > /* 0 reserved for invalid/unassigned ppgtt */
> > > xa_init_flags(&file_priv->vm_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
> > >
> > > - ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, 0);
> > > + pc = proto_context_create(i915, 0);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pc)) {
> > > + err = PTR_ERR(pc);
> > > + goto err;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, pc);
> > > + proto_context_close(pc);
> > > if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
> > > err = PTR_ERR(ctx);
> > > goto err;
> > > @@ -1884,6 +1967,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dev);
> > > struct drm_i915_gem_context_create_ext *args = data;
> > > + struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc;
> > > struct create_ext ext_data;
> > > int ret;
> > > u32 id;
> > > @@ -1906,7 +1990,12 @@ int i915_gem_context_create_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > return -EIO;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - ext_data.ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, args->flags);
> > > + pc = proto_context_create(i915, args->flags);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pc))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(pc);
> > > +
> > > + ext_data.ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, pc);
> > > + proto_context_close(pc);
> > > if (IS_ERR(ext_data.ctx))
> > > return PTR_ERR(ext_data.ctx);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> > > index 5f0673a2129f9..0bf337b6d89ac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
> > > @@ -66,6 +66,28 @@ struct i915_gem_engines_iter {
> > > const struct i915_gem_engines *engines;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * struct i915_gem_proto_context - prototype context
> > > + *
> > > + * The struct i915_gem_proto_context represents the creation parameters for
> > > + * an i915_gem_context. This is used to gather parameters provided either
> >
> > a struct i915_gem_context
>
> Done.
>
> > With that you get an automatic neat hyperlink. See
> >
> > https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#highlights-and-cross-references
> >
> > for what it all recognizes automatically.
> >
> > > + * through creation flags or via SET_CONTEXT_PARAM so that, when we create
> > > + * the final i915_gem_context, those parameters can be immutable.
> > > + */
> > > +struct i915_gem_proto_context {
> > > + /** @vm: See i915_gem_context::vm */
> >
> > Hyperlinks need &i915_gem_context.vm in kerneldoc. Same for the others
> > below.
>
> Fixed.
>
> I'll try to dig through your previous one now. I thought I'd gotten
> everything but clearly you found something I hadn't.
>
> --Jason
>
> > > + struct i915_address_space *vm;
> > > +
> > > + /** @user_flags: See i915_gem_context::user_flags */
> > > + unsigned long user_flags;
> > > +
> > > + /** @sched: See i915_gem_context::sched */
> > > + struct i915_sched_attr sched;
> > > +
> > > + /** @single_timeline: See See i915_gem_context::syncobj */
> > > + bool single_timeline;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * struct i915_gem_context - client state
> > > *
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_context.c
> > > index 51b5a3421b400..e0f512ef7f3c6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_context.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_context.c
> > > @@ -80,11 +80,17 @@ void mock_init_contexts(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > > struct i915_gem_context *
> > > live_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct file *file)
> > > {
> > > + struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc;
> > > struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> > > int err;
> > > u32 id;
> > >
> > > - ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, 0);
> > > + pc = proto_context_create(i915, 0);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pc))
> > > + return ERR_CAST(pc);
> > > +
> > > + ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, pc);
> > > + proto_context_close(pc);
> > > if (IS_ERR(ctx))
> > > return ctx;
> > >
> > > @@ -142,8 +148,14 @@ struct i915_gem_context *
> > > kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > > {
> > > struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
> > > + struct i915_gem_proto_context *pc;
> > > +
> > > + pc = proto_context_create(i915, 0);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pc))
> > > + return ERR_CAST(pc);
> > >
> > > - ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, 0);
> > > + ctx = i915_gem_create_context(i915, pc);
> > > + proto_context_close(pc);
> > > if (IS_ERR(ctx))
> > > return ctx;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list