[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/xehpsdv/dg1/tgl: Fix issue with LRI relative addressing
Ramalingam C
ramalingam.c at intel.com
Mon Apr 25 15:23:15 UTC 2022
From: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin at intel.com>
When bit 19 of MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM instruction opcode is set on tgl+
devices, HW does not care about certain register address offsets, but
instead check the following for valid address ranges on specific engines:
RCS && CCS: BITS(0 - 10)
BCS: BITS(0 - 11)
VECS && VCS: BITS(0 - 13)
Also, tgl+ now support relative addressing for BCS engine - So, this
patch fixes issue with live_gt_lrc selftest that is failing where there is
mismatch between LRC register layout generated during init and HW
default register offsets.
Signed-off-by: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin at intel.com>
cc: Prathap Kumar Valsan <prathap.kumar.valsan at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index 6ba52ef1acb8..8dc7b88cdca0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -128,6 +128,27 @@ static int context_flush(struct intel_context *ce, long timeout)
return err;
}
+static int get_lri_mask(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 lri)
+{
+ if ((lri & MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO) == 0)
+ return ~0u;
+
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER(engine->i915) < 12)
+ return 0xfff;
+
+ switch (engine->class) {
+ default:
+ case RENDER_CLASS:
+ case COMPUTE_CLASS:
+ return 0x07ff;
+ case COPY_ENGINE_CLASS:
+ return 0x0fff;
+ case VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS:
+ case VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS:
+ return 0x3fff;
+ }
+}
+
static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
{
struct intel_gt *gt = arg;
@@ -167,6 +188,7 @@ static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
dw = 0;
do {
u32 lri = READ_ONCE(hw[dw]);
+ u32 lri_mask;
if (lri == 0) {
dw++;
@@ -194,6 +216,18 @@ static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
break;
}
+ /*
+ * When bit 19 of MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM instruction
+ * opcode is set on Gen12+ devices, HW does not
+ * care about certain register address offsets, and
+ * instead check the following for valid address
+ * ranges on specific engines:
+ * RCS && CCS: BITS(0 - 10)
+ * BCS: BITS(0 - 11)
+ * VECS && VCS: BITS(0 - 13)
+ */
+ lri_mask = get_lri_mask(engine, lri);
+
lri &= 0x7f;
lri++;
dw++;
@@ -201,7 +235,7 @@ static int live_lrc_layout(void *arg)
while (lri) {
u32 offset = READ_ONCE(hw[dw]);
- if (offset != lrc[dw]) {
+ if ((offset ^ lrc[dw]) & lri_mask) {
pr_err("%s: Different registers found at dword %d, expected %x, found %x\n",
engine->name, dw, offset, lrc[dw]);
err = -EINVAL;
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list