[Intel-gfx] [v5, 13/14] drm/i915/gsc: allocate extended operational memory in LMEM
Winkler, Tomas
tomas.winkler at intel.com
Tue Aug 2 18:49:35 UTC 2022
>
> Looks good, just a minor nit.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
>
>
> On Wed, 2022-07-06 at 14:43 +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> > From: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler at intel.com>
> >
> > GSC requires more operational memory than available on chip.
> > Reserve 4M of LMEM for GSC operation. The memory is provided to the
> > GSC as struct resource to the auxiliary data of the child device.
> >
> > Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
> > <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gsc.c | 92
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gsc.h
> |
> > 3 +
> > 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > + if (def->lmem_size) {
> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "setting up GSC lmem\n");
> >
> NIT: Any reason we are not being consistent and using drm_err / drm_debug
> (same below)? either way, ensuring we get PCI device id info in the dmesg
> output we are good.
Thanks, will fix.
> > +
> > + if (gsc_ext_om_alloc(gsc, intf, def->lmem_size)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "setting up gsc extended
> operational memory failed\n");
> > + kfree(adev);
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + adev->ext_op_mem.start =
> i915_gem_object_get_dma_address(intf->gem_obj, 0);
> > + adev->ext_op_mem.end = adev->ext_op_mem.start + def-
> >lmem_size;
> > + }
> > +
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list