[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_balancer: fix parallel_ordering with no-reloc

Das, Nirmoy nirmoy.das at intel.com
Fri Jun 10 10:27:04 UTC 2022


wrong mailing list, Ignore this.

On 6/10/2022 12:20 PM, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Make sure to allocate ahnd so that spinner starts with no-reloc
> execbuf otherwise this will fail on platforms with relocation disabled.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6117
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c
> index 186975c46..636c96f9e 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c
> @@ -3108,6 +3108,7 @@ static void parallel_ordering(int i915, unsigned int flags)
>   		unsigned int count;
>   		int i = 0, fence = 0;
>   		uint32_t batch[16];
> +		uint64_t ahnd;
>   		struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
>   		struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj[32];
>   		igt_spin_t *spin;
> @@ -3162,7 +3163,9 @@ static void parallel_ordering(int i915, unsigned int flags)
>   
>   		/* Block parallel submission */
>   		spin_ctx = ctx_create_engines(i915, siblings, count);
> +		ahnd = get_simple_ahnd(i915, spin_ctx->id);
>   		spin = __igt_spin_new(i915,
> +				      .ahnd = ahnd,
>   				      .ctx = spin_ctx,
>   				      .engine = 0,
>   				      .flags = IGT_SPIN_FENCE_OUT |


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list