[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915/intel_combo_phy: Print procmon ref values
Nautiyal, Ankit K
ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com
Tue Mar 15 10:12:15 UTC 2022
On 3/15/2022 2:08 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com> wrote:
>> Add debug print for Procmon Ref values, to help get the
>> voltage configurations of combo PHYs.
>>
>> v2: Used drm_dbg_kms for logs. (Jani)
>> Added names for different voltage levels. (Imre)
>>
>> Suggested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c | 36 +++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c
>> index 4dfe77351b8b..7ccf45578a7f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c
>> @@ -25,18 +25,29 @@ enum {
>> };
>>
>> static const struct icl_procmon {
>> + char name[30];
> const char * please, and ditch those \0's in the initialization.
Thanks Jani. Fixed in new version.
Regards,
Ankit
>
>> u32 dw1, dw9, dw10;
>> } icl_procmon_values[] = {
>> - [PROCMON_0_85V_DOT_0] =
>> - { .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x62AB67BB, .dw10 = 0x51914F96, },
>> - [PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_0] =
>> - { .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x86E172C7, .dw10 = 0x77CA5EAB, },
>> - [PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_1] =
>> - { .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x93F87FE1, .dw10 = 0x8AE871C5, },
>> - [PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_0] =
>> - { .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x98FA82DD, .dw10 = 0x89E46DC1, },
>> - [PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_1] =
>> - { .dw1 = 0x00440000, .dw9 = 0x9A00AB25, .dw10 = 0x8AE38FF1, },
>> + [PROCMON_0_85V_DOT_0] = {
>> + .name = "0.85V dot0 (low-voltage)\0",
>> + .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x62AB67BB, .dw10 = 0x51914F96,
>> + },
>> + [PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_0] = {
>> + .name = "0.95V dot0\0",
>> + .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x86E172C7, .dw10 = 0x77CA5EAB,
>> + },
>> + [PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_1] = {
>> + .name = "0.95V dot1\0",
>> + .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x93F87FE1, .dw10 = 0x8AE871C5,
>> + },
>> + [PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_0] = {
>> + .name = "1.05V dot0\0",
>> + .dw1 = 0x00000000, .dw9 = 0x98FA82DD, .dw10 = 0x89E46DC1,
>> + },
>> + [PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_1] = {
>> + .name = "1.05V dot1\0",
>> + .dw1 = 0x00440000, .dw9 = 0x9A00AB25, .dw10 = 0x8AE38FF1,
>> + },
>> };
>>
>> static const struct icl_procmon *
>> @@ -113,6 +124,11 @@ static bool icl_verify_procmon_ref_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>
>> procmon = icl_get_procmon_ref_values(dev_priv, phy);
>>
>> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
>> + "Combo PHY %c %s PROCMON values : 0x%x, 0x%x, 0x%x\n",
>> + phy_name(phy), procmon->name, procmon->dw1, procmon->dw9,
>> + procmon->dw10);
>> +
>> ret = check_phy_reg(dev_priv, phy, ICL_PORT_COMP_DW1(phy),
>> (0xff << 16) | 0xff, procmon->dw1);
>> ret &= check_phy_reg(dev_priv, phy, ICL_PORT_COMP_DW9(phy),
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list