[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display/: Refactor hsw_crtc_enable for bigjoiner cleanup

Navare, Manasi manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Thu Mar 17 19:05:47 UTC 2022


On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 08:52:52PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:38:56PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > This patch abstracts pieces of hsw_crtc_enable corresponding to different
> > Bspec enable sequence steps into separate functions.
> > This helps to call them in a specific order for bigjoiner master/slave
> > in a cleaner fashion.
> > 
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 125 ++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index eb49973621f0..d8e6466c9fa0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -1865,24 +1865,6 @@ static void hsw_set_frame_start_delay(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  	intel_de_write(dev_priv, reg, val);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > -					 const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > -{
> > -	struct intel_crtc *master_crtc = intel_master_crtc(crtc_state);
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Enable sequence steps 1-7 on bigjoiner master
> > -	 */
> > -	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> > -		intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, master_crtc);
> > -
> > -	if (crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> > -		intel_enable_shared_dpll(crtc_state);
> > -
> > -	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> > -		intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, master_crtc);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > @@ -1910,70 +1892,73 @@ static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta
> >  	hsw_set_transconf(crtc_state);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > -			    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +static void hsw_crtc_pre_pll_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > +				    const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  {
> > -	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> > -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> > -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > -	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> > -	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> > -	bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> > -
> > -	if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> > -		return;
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> >  
> > -	if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) {
> > -		intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Enable sequence steps 1 - 7 on all pipes
> > +	 */
> > +	intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> > +	if (crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> > +		intel_enable_shared_dpll(crtc_state);
> >  
> > -		if (new_crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> > -			intel_enable_shared_dpll(new_crtc_state);
> > +	intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> > +}
> >  
> > -		intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> > -	} else {
> > -		icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> > -	}
> > +static void hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > +				     const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > +	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> > +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> > +	bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> >  
> > -	intel_dsc_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Enable sequence step 8
> > +	 */
> > +	intel_dsc_enable(crtc_state);
> >  
> >  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13)
> > -		intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > +		intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(crtc_state);
> >  
> > -	intel_set_pipe_src_size(new_crtc_state);
> > +	intel_set_pipe_src_size(crtc_state);
> >  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9 || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> > -		bdw_set_pipemisc(new_crtc_state);
> > +		bdw_set_pipemisc(crtc_state);
> >  
> > -	if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state) &&
> > +	if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state) &&
> >  	    !transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder))
> > -		hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(new_crtc_state);
> > +		hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(crtc_state);
> >  
> >  	crtc->active = true;
> >  
> >  	/* Display WA #1180: WaDisableScalarClockGating: glk */
> >  	psl_clkgate_wa = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10 &&
> > -		new_crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
> > +		crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
> >  	if (psl_clkgate_wa)
> >  		glk_pipe_scaler_clock_gating_wa(dev_priv, pipe, true);
> >  
> >  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
> > -		skl_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > +		skl_pfit_enable(crtc_state);
> >  	else
> > -		ilk_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > +		ilk_pfit_enable(crtc_state);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * On ILK+ LUT must be loaded before the pipe is running but with
> >  	 * clocks enabled
> >  	 */
> > -	intel_color_load_luts(new_crtc_state);
> > -	intel_color_commit(new_crtc_state);
> > +	intel_color_load_luts(crtc_state);
> > +	intel_color_commit(crtc_state);
> >  	/* update DSPCNTR to configure gamma/csc for pipe bottom color */
> >  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
> > -		intel_disable_primary_plane(new_crtc_state);
> > +		intel_disable_primary_plane(crtc_state);
> >  
> > -	hsw_set_linetime_wm(new_crtc_state);
> > +	hsw_set_linetime_wm(crtc_state);
> >  
> >  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > -		icl_set_pipe_chicken(new_crtc_state);
> > +		icl_set_pipe_chicken(crtc_state);
> >  
> >  	intel_initial_watermarks(state, crtc);
> >  
> > @@ -1984,8 +1969,8 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  		icl_pipe_mbus_enable(crtc, dbuf_state->joined_mbus);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state))
> > -		intel_crtc_vblank_on(new_crtc_state);
> > +	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> > +		intel_crtc_vblank_on(crtc_state);
> >  
> >  	intel_encoders_enable(state, crtc);
> >  
> > @@ -1996,7 +1981,7 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  
> >  	/* If we change the relative order between pipe/planes enabling, we need
> >  	 * to change the workaround. */
> > -	hsw_workaround_pipe = new_crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
> > +	hsw_workaround_pipe = crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
> >  	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && hsw_workaround_pipe != INVALID_PIPE) {
> >  		struct intel_crtc *wa_crtc;
> >  
> > @@ -2007,6 +1992,29 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > +			    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +{
> > +	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> > +		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> > +	struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > +
> > +	if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	hsw_crtc_pre_pll_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > +	for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, slave_crtc,
> > +					 intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(new_crtc_state)) {
> > +		struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> > +			intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, slave_crtc);
> > +
> > +		hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(state, slave_crtc_state);
> > +	}
> > +	hsw_crtc_post_pll_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> > +}
> 
> I suspect this is far too high level for bigjoiner. Eg. there's a bunch
> of things already in the disable sequence that seem to need much more
> low level sequencing between the joined pipes. So my gut feeling still
> is that we want to continue the per-pipe vs. per-transcoder split and
> do the joiner loops in lower level code.
>

But for enable sequence upto all pre_pll_enable needs to happen for master and then post_pll_enable for all slaves first and then master.
Hence added the sequencing here. Because like I have split here the post_pll_enable covers Bspec step 8 and hence that needs to happen for all
slaves first and then master.
I believe this cleans up a lot of bigjoiner special casing.

Further like Jani said, I can just make a separate icl_crtc_enable hook and only that will have this sequence.

Does this make sense as a first refacoring step? This should to scale the code to multiple joiners.

Manasi
 
> > +
> >  void ilk_pfit_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(old_crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > @@ -8122,11 +8130,11 @@ static void intel_enable_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  
> >  	intel_crtc_update_active_timings(new_crtc_state);
> >  
> > -	dev_priv->display->crtc_enable(state, crtc);
> > -
> >  	if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(new_crtc_state))
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	dev_priv->display->crtc_enable(state, crtc);
> > +
> >  	intel_drrs_enable(new_crtc_state);
> >  
> >  	/* vblanks work again, re-enable pipe CRC. */
> > @@ -8360,8 +8368,7 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		if (intel_dp_mst_is_slave_trans(new_crtc_state) ||
> > -		    is_trans_port_sync_master(new_crtc_state) ||
> > -		    intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(new_crtc_state))
> > +		    is_trans_port_sync_master(new_crtc_state))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		modeset_pipes &= ~BIT(pipe);
> > @@ -8371,7 +8378,7 @@ static void skl_commit_modeset_enables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Then we enable all remaining pipes that depend on other
> > -	 * pipes: MST slaves and port sync masters, big joiner master
> > +	 * pipes: MST slaves and port sync masters
> >  	 */
> >  	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
> >  		enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> > -- 
> > 2.19.1
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list