[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/14] drm/i915/uncore: Add GSI offset to uncore

Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Thu Sep 8 21:16:27 UTC 2022



On 9/6/2022 4:49 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> GT non-engine registers (referred to as "GSI" registers by the spec)
> have the same relative offsets on standalone media as they do on the
> primary GT, just with an additional "GSI offset" added to their MMIO
> address.  If we store this GSI offset in the standalone media's
> intel_uncore structure, it can be automatically applied to all GSI reg
> reads/writes that happen on that GT, allowing us to re-use our existing
> GT code with minimal changes.
>
> Forcewake and shadowed register tables for the media GT (which will be
> added in a future patch) are listed as final addresses that already
> include the GSI offset, so we also need to add the GSI offset before
> doing lookups of registers in one of those tables.
>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h |  1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c      | 10 ++++++++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h      | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>   3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> index 0e139f7d75ed..82dc28643572 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h
> @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ struct intel_gt_definition {
>   	enum intel_gt_type type;
>   	char *name;
>   	u32 mapping_base;
> +	u32 gsi_offset;
>   	intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask;
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index 452b3a31e965..5cd423c7b646 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -928,6 +928,9 @@ find_fw_domain(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
>   {
>   	const struct intel_forcewake_range *entry;
>   
> +	if (IS_GSI_REG(offset))
> +		offset += uncore->gsi_offset;
> +
>   	entry = BSEARCH(offset,
>   			uncore->fw_domains_table,
>   			uncore->fw_domains_table_entries,
> @@ -1143,6 +1146,9 @@ static bool is_shadowed(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
>   	if (drm_WARN_ON(&uncore->i915->drm, !uncore->shadowed_reg_table))
>   		return false;
>   
> +	if (IS_GSI_REG(offset))
> +		offset += uncore->gsi_offset;
> +
>   	return BSEARCH(offset,
>   		       uncore->shadowed_reg_table,
>   		       uncore->shadowed_reg_table_entries,
> @@ -1995,8 +2001,8 @@ static int __fw_domain_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>   
>   	d->uncore = uncore;
>   	d->wake_count = 0;
> -	d->reg_set = uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg_set);
> -	d->reg_ack = uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg_ack);
> +	d->reg_set = uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg_set) + uncore->gsi_offset;
> +	d->reg_ack = uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg_ack) + uncore->gsi_offset;
>   
>   	d->id = domain_id;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> index 4acb78a03233..7f1d7903a8f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
> @@ -136,6 +136,16 @@ struct intel_uncore {
>   
>   	spinlock_t lock; /** lock is also taken in irq contexts. */
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Do we need to apply an additional offset to reach the beginning
> +	 * of the basic non-engine GT registers (referred to as "GSI" on
> +	 * newer platforms, or "GT block" on older platforms)?  If so, we'll
> +	 * track that here and apply it transparently to registers in the
> +	 * appropriate range to maintain compatibility with our existing
> +	 * register definitions and GT code.
> +	 */
> +	u32 gsi_offset;
> +
>   	unsigned int flags;
>   #define UNCORE_HAS_FORCEWAKE		BIT(0)
>   #define UNCORE_HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED	BIT(1)
> @@ -294,19 +304,27 @@ intel_wait_for_register_fw(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>   					    2, timeout_ms, NULL);
>   }
>   
> +#define IS_GSI_REG(reg) ((reg) < 0x40000)
> +
>   /* register access functions */
>   #define __raw_read(x__, s__) \
>   static inline u##x__ __raw_uncore_read##x__(const struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
>   					    i915_reg_t reg) \
>   { \
> -	return read##s__(uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
> +	u32 offset = i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg); \
> +	if (IS_GSI_REG(offset)) \
> +		offset += uncore->gsi_offset; \
> +	return read##s__(uncore->regs + offset); \
>   }
>   
>   #define __raw_write(x__, s__) \
>   static inline void __raw_uncore_write##x__(const struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
>   					   i915_reg_t reg, u##x__ val) \
>   { \
> -	write##s__(val, uncore->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
> +	u32 offset = i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg); \
> +	if (IS_GSI_REG(offset)) \
> +		offset += uncore->gsi_offset; \
> +	write##s__(val, uncore->regs + offset); \
>   }
>   __raw_read(8, b)
>   __raw_read(16, w)


Do we also need to update the raw_reg_<read/write> macros at the bottom 
of this file? Those seem to currently only be used for irq regs (which 
are outside the GSI range), so not structly required, but if we decide 
to not update them we should at least add a comment.

I'm also not sure why those macros exist to begin with as they're 
basically equivalent to __raw_uncore_<read/write>32, with the only 
difference being that uncore->regs is de-referenced outside the macro.

Daniele




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list