[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Drop pointless middle man variable

[Ville Syrjala]

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

No need for the 'procmon' variable here. Just return the correct
thing from the switch statement directly.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c | 18 +++++-------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c
index 64890f39c3cc..71d7aece1dc6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ static const struct icl_procmon {
 static const struct icl_procmon *
 icl_get_procmon_ref_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
 {
-	const struct icl_procmon *procmon;
 	u32 val;
 
 	val = intel_de_read(dev_priv, ICL_PORT_COMP_DW3(phy));
@@ -62,23 +61,16 @@ icl_get_procmon_ref_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
 		MISSING_CASE(val);
 		fallthrough;
 	case VOLTAGE_INFO_0_85V | PROCESS_INFO_DOT_0:
-		procmon = &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_0_85V_DOT_0];
-		break;
+		return &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_0_85V_DOT_0];
 	case VOLTAGE_INFO_0_95V | PROCESS_INFO_DOT_0:
-		procmon = &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_0];
-		break;
+		return &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_0];
 	case VOLTAGE_INFO_0_95V | PROCESS_INFO_DOT_1:
-		procmon = &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_1];
-		break;
+		return &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_0_95V_DOT_1];
 	case VOLTAGE_INFO_1_05V | PROCESS_INFO_DOT_0:
-		procmon = &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_0];
-		break;
+		return &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_0];
 	case VOLTAGE_INFO_1_05V | PROCESS_INFO_DOT_1:
-		procmon = &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_1];
-		break;
+		return &icl_procmon_values[PROCMON_1_05V_DOT_1];
 	}
-
-	return procmon;
 }
 
 static void icl_set_procmon_ref_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
-- 
2.35.1