[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Use i915 instead of dev_priv as name for the private device

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 14/02/2023 10:39, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:36:54PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 02:11:26PM +0100, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/10/2023 4:03 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
>>>> It is becoming a strong habit to call the drm_i915_private
>>>> structures "i915", but there are still many left that are called
>>>> dev_priv.
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes this makes grepping a bit challenging and anyway it
>>>> keeps a coherent style.
>>>>
>>>> Rename all the "dev_priv" structures in the gt/* directory to
>>>> "i915".
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> just checking if we want something similar. I have this same
>>>> replicated patch for the rest of i915 but I want to make sure we
>>>> actually want it.
> 
> Thanks Nirmoy for the review!
> 
>>> I might be lacking historical context here but I assumption is we are
>>> moving towards replacing dev_priv with i915 everywhere.
>>
>> Context: 20230201135329.514677-1-luciano.coelho at intel.com and 87bkml5wv4.fsf at intel.com
> 
> I think I have everything fixed, just didn't have time to format
> patches correctly. So that I decided to take this baby step
> to test the ground first and then move forward in the next couple
> of weeks.
> 
> I don't think this patch that affects only the content of "gt/"
> has any dependency on dev_priv macros so that please let me know
> if anyone has anything against.

No complaints, to the contrary!

Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko