[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/mtl: Wa_22011802037: don't complain about missing regs on MTL

Umesh Nerlige Ramappa umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com
Thu Jan 26 20:12:10 UTC 2023


On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 07:10:33AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
>   Patch Details
>
>Series:  drm/i915/mtl: Wa_22011802037: don't complain about missing regs on MTL
>URL:     [1]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/113293/
>State:   failure
>Details: [2]https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_113293v1/index.html
>
>     CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12630_full -> Patchwork_113293v1_full
>
>Summary
>
>   FAILURE
>
>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_113293v1_full absolutely
>   need to be
>   verified manually.
>
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in Patchwork_113293v1_full, please notify your bug team to
>   allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
>   CI.
>
>   External URL:
>   https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_113293v1/index.html
>
>Participating hosts (13 -> 11)
>
>   Missing (2): pig-skl-6260u pig-kbl-iris
>
>Possible new issues
>
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
>   Patchwork_113293v1_full:
>
>  IGT changes
>
>    Possible regressions
>
>igt at kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-busy-crc-legacy:
>
>          * shard-glk: [3]PASS -> [4]FAIL

Unrelated, since this patch is just dropping an error message, without 
any changes to code logic.

Umesh

>
>Known issues


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list