[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Simplify intel_cx0_program_phy_lane() with loop
Gustavo Sousa
gustavo.sousa at intel.com
Mon Jul 31 12:58:27 UTC 2023
Quoting Jani Nikula (2023-07-31 08:04:12-03:00)
>On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com> wrote:
>> It is possible to generalize the "disable" value for the transmitters to
>> be a bit mask based on the port width and the port reversal boolean,
>> with a small exception for DP-alt mode with "x1" port width.
>>
>> Simplify the code by using such a mask and a for-loop instead of using
>> switch-case statements.
>>
>> BSpec: 64539
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 79 +++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
>> index b903ceb0b56a..f10ebdfd696a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c
>> @@ -2604,7 +2604,8 @@ static void intel_cx0_program_phy_lane(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> struct intel_encoder *encoder, int lane_count,
>> bool lane_reversal)
>> {
>> - u8 l0t1, l0t2, l1t1, l1t2;
>> + int i;
>> + u8 disables;
>> bool dp_alt_mode = intel_tc_port_in_dp_alt_mode(enc_to_dig_port(encoder));
>> enum port port = encoder->port;
>>
>> @@ -2614,66 +2615,26 @@ static void intel_cx0_program_phy_lane(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> C10_VDR_CTRL_MSGBUS_ACCESS,
>> MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
>>
>> - /* TODO: DP-alt MFD case where only one PHY lane should be programmed. */
>> - l0t1 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2));
>> - l0t2 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2));
>> - l1t1 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2));
>> - l1t2 = intel_cx0_read(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2));
>> -
>> - l0t1 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - l0t2 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - l1t1 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - l1t2 |= CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> -
>> - if (lane_reversal) {
>> - switch (lane_count) {
>> - case 4:
>> - l0t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - fallthrough;
>> - case 3:
>> - l0t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - fallthrough;
>> - case 2:
>> - l1t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - fallthrough;
>> - case 1:
>> - l1t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - break;
>> - default:
>> - MISSING_CASE(lane_count);
>> - }
>> - } else {
>> - switch (lane_count) {
>> - case 4:
>> - l1t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - fallthrough;
>> - case 3:
>> - l1t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - fallthrough;
>> - case 2:
>> - l0t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - l0t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - break;
>> - case 1:
>> - if (dp_alt_mode)
>> - l0t2 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - else
>> - l0t1 &= ~CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX;
>> - break;
>> - default:
>> - MISSING_CASE(lane_count);
>> - }
>> + if (lane_reversal)
>> + disables = REG_GENMASK8(3, 0) >> lane_count;
>> + else
>> + disables = REG_GENMASK8(3, 0) << lane_count;
>> +
>> + if (dp_alt_mode && lane_count == 1) {
>> + disables &= ~REG_GENMASK8(1, 0);
>> + disables |= REG_FIELD_PREP8(REG_GENMASK8(1, 0), 0x1);
>> }
>>
>> - /* disable MLs */
>> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2),
>> - l0t1, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
>> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE0, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2),
>> - l0t2, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
>> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(1, 2),
>> - l1t1, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
>> - intel_cx0_write(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_LANE1, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(2, 2),
>> - l1t2, MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
>> + /* TODO: DP-alt MFD case where only one PHY lane should be programmed. */
>> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> + int tx = i % 2 + 1;
>> + u8 lane_mask = i / 2 == 0 ? INTEL_CX0_LANE0 : INTEL_CX0_LANE1;
>
>I'm just catching up on mails and quickly eyeballing stuff, but
>
> i / 2 == 0
>
>looks suspect.
i / 2 == 0 should give us the correct selection of lane_mask: the first two
iterations are for the first PHY lane and the last two are for the last PHY
lane.
--
Gustavo Sousa
>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>> +
>> + intel_cx0_rmw(i915, port, lane_mask, PHY_CX0_TX_CONTROL(tx, 2),
>> + CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX,
>> + disables & BIT(i) ? CONTROL2_DISABLE_SINGLE_TX : 0,
>> + MB_WRITE_COMMITTED);
>> + }
>>
>> if (intel_is_c10phy(i915, intel_port_to_phy(i915, port)))
>> intel_cx0_rmw(i915, port, INTEL_CX0_BOTH_LANES,
>
>--
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list