[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: rename I915_PMU_MAX_GTS to I915_PMU_MAX_GT

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Mon Jun 5 09:24:15 UTC 2023


On 03/06/2023 00:17, Matt Atwood wrote:
> _GTS as an abbreviation here leads to some confusion, match other
> definitions and drop the s.
> 
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <andy.shyti at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h | 8 ++++----
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> index f96fe92dca4e..d35973b41186 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static u32 frequency_enabled_mask(void)
>   	unsigned int i;
>   	u32 mask = 0;
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < I915_PMU_MAX_GTS; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < I915_PMU_MAX_GT; i++)
>   		mask |= config_mask(__I915_PMU_ACTUAL_FREQUENCY(i)) |
>   			config_mask(__I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY(i));
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> index d20592e7db99..41af038c3738 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ enum {
>   	__I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS
>   };
>   
> -#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS 2
> +#define I915_PMU_MAX_GT 2

Shrug from me since I wasn't a fan* of the original s/gts/gt/ effort. 
But AFAIR that has been done already, I guess consistency wins so I am 
not blocking it either.

Regards,

Tvrtko

*) What is a max gt? Can I index it into the array? Or expect the gt id 
to contain that value? Neither is true hence my dislike.

>   
>   /*
>    * How many different events we track in the global PMU mask.
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ enum {
>    */
>   #define I915_PMU_MASK_BITS \
>   	(I915_ENGINE_SAMPLE_COUNT + \
> -	 I915_PMU_MAX_GTS * __I915_PMU_TRACKED_EVENT_COUNT)
> +	 I915_PMU_MAX_GT * __I915_PMU_TRACKED_EVENT_COUNT)
>   
>   #define I915_ENGINE_SAMPLE_COUNT (I915_SAMPLE_SEMA + 1)
>   
> @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ struct i915_pmu {
>   	 * Only global counters are held here, while the per-engine ones are in
>   	 * struct intel_engine_cs.
>   	 */
> -	struct i915_pmu_sample sample[I915_PMU_MAX_GTS][__I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS];
> +	struct i915_pmu_sample sample[I915_PMU_MAX_GT][__I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS];
>   	/**
>   	 * @sleep_last: Last time GT parked for RC6 estimation.
>   	 */
> -	ktime_t sleep_last[I915_PMU_MAX_GTS];
> +	ktime_t sleep_last[I915_PMU_MAX_GT];
>   	/**
>   	 * @irq_count: Number of interrupts
>   	 *


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list