[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: fix DSS CTL register offsets for TGL+
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Mon Mar 6 16:25:01 UTC 2023
On Wed, 01 Mar 2023, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:14:09PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On TGL+ the DSS control registers are at different offsets, and there's
>> one per pipe. Fix the offsets to fix dual link DSI for TGL+.
>>
>> There would be helpers for this in the DSC code, but just do the quick
>> fix now for DSI. Long term, we should probably move all the DSS handling
>> into intel_vdsc.c, so exporting the helpers seems counter-productive.
>
> I'm not entirely happy with intel_vdsc.c since it handles
> both the hardware VDSC block (which includes DSS, and so
> also uncompressed joiner and MSO), and also some actual
> DSC calculations/etc. Might be nice to have a cleaner
> split of some sort.
>
> That also reminds me that MSO+dsc/joiner is probably going
> to fail miserably given that neither side knows about the
> other and both poke the DSS registers.
>
>>
>> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8232
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
>> index b5316715bb3b..5a17ab3f0d1a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
>> @@ -277,9 +277,21 @@ static void configure_dual_link_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(encoder);
>> + i915_reg_t dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl2_reg;
>> u32 dss_ctl1;
>>
>> - dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DSS_CTL1);
>> + /* FIXME: Move all DSS handling to intel_vdsc.c */
>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(pipe_config->uapi.crtc);
>> +
>> + dss_ctl1_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL1(crtc->pipe);
>> + dss_ctl2_reg = ICL_PIPE_DSS_CTL2(crtc->pipe);
>> + } else {
>> + dss_ctl1_reg = DSS_CTL1;
>> + dss_ctl2_reg = DSS_CTL2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dss_ctl1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, dss_ctl1_reg);
>
> Side note: should get rid of this rmw to make sure the thing
> fully configuerd the way we want...
>
> Anyways, this seems fine for now:
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Thanks, pushed to din.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> dss_ctl1 |= SPLITTER_ENABLE;
>> dss_ctl1 &= ~OVERLAP_PIXELS_MASK;
>> dss_ctl1 |= OVERLAP_PIXELS(intel_dsi->pixel_overlap);
>> @@ -299,14 +311,14 @@ static void configure_dual_link_mode(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>
>> dss_ctl1 &= ~LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK;
>> dss_ctl1 |= LEFT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth);
>> - intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DSS_CTL2, RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
>> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, dss_ctl2_reg, RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH_MASK,
>> RIGHT_DL_BUF_TARGET_DEPTH(dl_buffer_depth));
>> } else {
>> /* Interleave */
>> dss_ctl1 |= DUAL_LINK_MODE_INTERLEAVE;
>> }
>>
>> - intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSS_CTL1, dss_ctl1);
>> + intel_de_write(dev_priv, dss_ctl1_reg, dss_ctl1);
>> }
>>
>> /* aka DSI 8X clock */
>> --
>> 2.39.1
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list