[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/6] drm/i915/psr: Implement Wa_14015648006
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Wed Mar 29 11:44:36 UTC 2023
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:45:29PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
> disabled. Also same WA should be applied for ICL as well.
>
> Bspec: 71580
>
> v4:
> - Handle mode change in psr enable/disable
> - Handle wm_level_disable changes separately in pre plane hook
> v3:
> - Split patch
> v2:
> - set/clear chicken bit in post_plane_update
> - apply for ICL as well
>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 7 +++++--
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index ab146b5b68bd..4236ad751c2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1157,6 +1157,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
> bool has_psr2;
> bool enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
> bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> + bool wm_level_disabled;
> u32 dc3co_exitline;
> u16 su_y_granularity;
> struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp psr_vsc;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 26ad4365960f..9c416b301555 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1136,6 +1136,7 @@ static u32 wa_16013835468_bit_get(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> /*
> * Wa_16013835468
> + * Wa_14015648006
> */
> static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> @@ -1143,6 +1144,11 @@ static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> bool set_wa_bit = false;
>
> + /* Wa_14015648006 */
> + if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
> + set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
> +
> /* Wa_16013835468 */
> if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
> @@ -1197,6 +1203,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>
> /*
> * Wa_16013835468
> + * Wa_14015648006
> */
> wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, crtc_state);
>
> @@ -1374,8 +1381,9 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> /*
> * Wa_16013835468
> + * Wa_14015648006
> */
> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
>
> @@ -1949,6 +1957,10 @@ void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> if (psr->enabled && needs_to_disable)
> intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> + else if (psr->enabled && old_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled !=
> + new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
> + /* Wa_14015648006 */
> + wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, new_crtc_state);
This can now also clear the bit, which is the wrong thing
to do in pre_plane_update().
>
> mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index ff70225c0263..7e2e76afbf2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -2276,9 +2276,12 @@ static int skl_wm_check_vblank(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> return level;
>
> /*
> - * FIXME PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> + * PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> * based on whether we're limited by the vblank duration.
> - *
> + */
> + crtc_state->wm_level_disabled = level < i915->display.wm.num_levels - 1;
> +
> + /*
> * FIXME also related to skl+ w/a 1136 (also unimplemented as of
> * now) perhaps?
> */
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list