[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 3/6] drm/i915/psr: Implement Wa_14015648006

Hogander, Jouni jouni.hogander at intel.com
Wed Mar 29 12:44:51 UTC 2023


On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 14:44 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:45:29PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> > PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
> > disabled. Also same WA should be applied for ICL as well.
> > 
> > Bspec: 71580
> > 
> > v4:
> >  - Handle mode change in psr enable/disable
> >  - Handle wm_level_disable changes separately in pre plane hook
> > v3:
> >  - Split patch
> > v2:
> >  - set/clear chicken bit in post_plane_update
> >  - apply for ICL as well
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c           | 14
> > +++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c       |  7 +++++--
> >  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > index ab146b5b68bd..4236ad751c2c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > @@ -1157,6 +1157,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
> >         bool has_psr2;
> >         bool enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
> >         bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> > +       bool wm_level_disabled;
> >         u32 dc3co_exitline;
> >         u16 su_y_granularity;
> >         struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp psr_vsc;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 26ad4365960f..9c416b301555 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -1136,6 +1136,7 @@ static u32 wa_16013835468_bit_get(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * Wa_16013835468
> > + * Wa_14015648006
> >   */
> >  static void wm_optimization_wa(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >                                const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > @@ -1143,6 +1144,11 @@ static void wm_optimization_wa(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> >         bool set_wa_bit = false;
> >  
> > +       /* Wa_14015648006 */
> > +       if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> > +           IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
> > +               set_wa_bit |= crtc_state->wm_level_disabled;
> > +
> >         /* Wa_16013835468 */
> >         if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> >                 set_wa_bit |= crtc_state-
> > >hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
> > @@ -1197,6 +1203,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >  
> >         /*
> >          * Wa_16013835468
> > +        * Wa_14015648006
> >          */
> >         wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> >  
> > @@ -1374,8 +1381,9 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  
> >         /*
> >          * Wa_16013835468
> > +        * Wa_14015648006
> >          */
> > -       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
> > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> >                 intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> >                              wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
> >  
> > @@ -1949,6 +1957,10 @@ void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct
> > intel_atomic_state *state,
> >  
> >                 if (psr->enabled && needs_to_disable)
> >                         intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> > +               else if (psr->enabled && old_crtc_state-
> > >wm_level_disabled !=
> > +                        new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
> > +                       /* Wa_14015648006 */
> > +                       wm_optimization_wa(intel_dp,
> > new_crtc_state);
> 
> This can now also clear the bit, which is the wrong thing
> to do in pre_plane_update().

Yes, you are right, I will fix this.
> 
> >  
> >                 mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> >         }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > index ff70225c0263..7e2e76afbf2a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > @@ -2276,9 +2276,12 @@ static int skl_wm_check_vblank(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >                 return level;
> >  
> >         /*
> > -        * FIXME PSR needs to toggle
> > LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> > +        * PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> >          * based on whether we're limited by the vblank duration.
> > -        *
> > +        */
> > +       crtc_state->wm_level_disabled = level < i915-
> > >display.wm.num_levels - 1;
> > +
> > +       /*
> >          * FIXME also related to skl+ w/a 1136 (also unimplemented
> > as of
> >          * now) perhaps?
> >          */
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> 



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list