[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Abstract display info away during probe

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> The goal is to have this function ready for Xe to use
> directly. So, let's use the available macro.

Seesm wrong to use DISPLAY_INFO() as an lvalue, and I'm not sure why
this wouldn't work as-is.

But *shrug*.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>

for merging to i915. (xe should come as a backport with cherry-pick -x.)

BR,
Jani


>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> index a6a18eae7ae8..ce55b968e658 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ void intel_display_device_probe(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  	else
>  		info = probe_display(i915);
>  
> -	i915->display.info.__device_info = info;
> +	DISPLAY_INFO(i915) = info;
>  
>  	memcpy(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915),
>  	       &DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->__runtime_defaults,

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel