[PATCH v6 1/2] drm/i915/display: Plane capability for 64k phys alignment
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Tue Aug 27 18:59:53 UTC 2024
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:26:46PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 07:01:15PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > Some plane formats have been designed to require 64k physical alignment.
> > By returning whether this is the case for certain formats, we do not
> > need to hardcode this check inside Xe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski at intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>
> I still believe that 'CAPS' 'needs64k' is strange. But this is indeed
> the cleanest way we found and easy to port to future platforms.
>
> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> to get this merged through drm-xe-next as well where this is
> needed right now.
Since it is display only and would depend on
commit fca0abb23447 ("drm/i915/display: allow creation of Xe2 ccs framebuffers")
to apply cleanly and this commit is only part of drm-intel-next yet,
I went ahead and did the other way around and push both patches,
including the Xe one into drm-intel-next.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> > index d2716915d046d..5be7bb43e2e0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.c
> > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static const struct intel_modifier_desc intel_modifiers[] = {
> > }, {
> > .modifier = I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED_BMG_CCS,
> > .display_ver = { 14, -1 },
> > - .plane_caps = INTEL_PLANE_CAP_TILING_4,
> > + .plane_caps = INTEL_PLANE_CAP_TILING_4 | INTEL_PLANE_CAP_NEED64K_PHYS,
> > }, {
> > .modifier = I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED_MTL_MC_CCS,
> > .display_ver = { 14, 14 },
> > @@ -420,6 +420,24 @@ bool intel_fb_is_mc_ccs_modifier(u64 modifier)
> > INTEL_PLANE_CAP_CCS_MC);
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * intel_fb_needs_64k_phys: Check if modifier requires 64k physical placement.
> > + * @modifier: Modifier to check
> > + *
> > + * Returns:
> > + * Returns %true if @modifier requires 64k aligned physical pages.
> > + */
> > +bool intel_fb_needs_64k_phys(u64 modifier)
> > +{
> > + const struct intel_modifier_desc *md = lookup_modifier_or_null(modifier);
> > +
> > + if (!md)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return plane_caps_contain_any(md->plane_caps,
> > + INTEL_PLANE_CAP_NEED64K_PHYS);
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool check_modifier_display_ver_range(const struct intel_modifier_desc *md,
> > u8 display_ver_from, u8 display_ver_until)
> > {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.h
> > index 6dee0c8b7f226..10de437e8ef84 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fb.h
> > @@ -28,11 +28,13 @@ struct intel_plane_state;
> > #define INTEL_PLANE_CAP_TILING_Y BIT(4)
> > #define INTEL_PLANE_CAP_TILING_Yf BIT(5)
> > #define INTEL_PLANE_CAP_TILING_4 BIT(6)
> > +#define INTEL_PLANE_CAP_NEED64K_PHYS BIT(7)
> >
> > bool intel_fb_is_tiled_modifier(u64 modifier);
> > bool intel_fb_is_ccs_modifier(u64 modifier);
> > bool intel_fb_is_rc_ccs_cc_modifier(u64 modifier);
> > bool intel_fb_is_mc_ccs_modifier(u64 modifier);
> > +bool intel_fb_needs_64k_phys(u64 modifier);
> >
> > bool intel_fb_is_ccs_aux_plane(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb, int color_plane);
> > int intel_fb_rc_ccs_cc_plane(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb);
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list