[PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Continue creating engine sysfs files even after a failure

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 07:05:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:31:40PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > The i915 driver generates sysfs entries for each engine of the
> > GPU in /sys/class/drm/cardX/engines/.
> > 
> > The process is straightforward: we loop over the UABI engines and
> > for each one, we:
> > 
> >  - Create the object.
> >  - Create basic files.
> >  - If the engine supports timeslicing, create timeslice duration files.
> >  - If the engine supports preemption, create preemption-related files.
> >  - Create default value files.
> > 
> > Currently, if any of these steps fail, the process stops, and no
> > further sysfs files are created.
> > 
> > However, it's not necessary to stop the process on failure.
> > Instead, we can continue creating the remaining sysfs files for
> > the other engines. Even if some files fail to be created, the
> > list of engines can still be retrieved by querying i915.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
> 
> Uh, sysfs is uapi. Either we need it, and it _must_ be there, or it's not
> needed, and we should delete those files probably.
> 
> This is different from debugfs, where failures are consistently ignored
> because that's the conscious design choice Greg made and wants supported.
> Because debugfs is optional.
> 
> So please make sure we correctly fail driver load if these don't register.
> Even better would be if sysfs files are registered atomically as attribute
> blocks, but that's an entire different can of worms. But that would really
> clean up this code and essentially put any failure handling onto core
> driver model and sysfs code.

Indeed very good point. Sorry for having missed this perspective.

> -Sima
> 
> > ---
> > Hi,
> > 
> > It might make sense to create an "inv-<engine_name>" if something
> > goes wrong, so that the user is aware that the engine exists, but
> > the sysfs file is not present.
> > 
> > One further improvement would be to provide more information
> > about thei failure reason the dev_warn() message.
> > 
> > Andi
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/sysfs_engines.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/sysfs_engines.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/sysfs_engines.c
> > index 021f51d9b456..aab2759067d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/sysfs_engines.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/sysfs_engines.c
> > @@ -530,9 +530,8 @@ void intel_engines_add_sysfs(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> >  err_object:
> >  			kobject_put(kobj);
> >  err_engine:
> > -			dev_err(kdev, "Failed to add sysfs engine '%s'\n",
> > -				engine->name);
> > -			break;
> > +			dev_warn(kdev, "Failed to add sysfs engine '%s'\n",
> > +				 engine->name);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.45.2
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch