[PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: After joiner compute pfit_dst
Cavitt, Jonathan
jonathan.cavitt at intel.com
Thu Dec 12 15:54:08 UTC 2024
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Nemesa Garg
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 6:33 AM
To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Garg, Nemesa <nemesa.garg at intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: After joiner compute pfit_dst
>
> In panel fitter/pipe scaler scenario the pch_pfit configuration
> currently takes place before accounting for pipe_src width for
> joiner. This causes issue when pch_pfit and joiner get enabled
> together.So once pipe src is computed adjust the pfit_dst.
> It can be done by computing per pipe output area first and then
> and then find the intersection of above area with pfit_dst and
> then adjust the coordinates.
Maybe reword the commit message as such:
"""
In the panel fitter/pipe scaler scenario, the pch_pfit configuration
currently takes place before accounting for pipe_src width for
joiner. This causes issues when pch_pfit and joiner get enabled
together. So, once pipe_src is computed, adjust the pfit_dst.
This can be done by first computing per pipe output area, then
finding the intersection of above area with pfit_dst before
finally adjusting the coordinates.
"""
The above is just a suggested full revision. The following
is all that's strictly necessary to fix:
s/together.So/together. So/
s/area first and then and then/area first and then/
>
> Signed-off-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 21319f753a34..7be2ea11b8b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2563,6 +2563,36 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The x-coordinate for Primary should be calculated in such a way
> + * that it remains consistent whether the pipes are joined or not.
> + * This means we need to consider the full width of the display even
> + * when the pipes are joined. The x-coordinate for secondaries is 0
> + * because it starts at the leftmost point of its own display area,
> + * ensuring that the framebuffer is centered within Pipe B’s portion
Pipe B’s portion of the overall display? This is probably just a corruption
in the email due to my mail viewer of choice, but if it's not, this needs to be
fixed before pushing.
> + * of the overall display.
> + */
> +static int intel_crtc_compute_pfit(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode;
> + struct drm_rect area;
> +
> + if (!crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled)
> + return 0;
> +
> + drm_rect_init(&area, 0, 0,
> + mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> + mode->crtc_vdisplay);
> +
> + if (!drm_rect_intersect(&crtc_state->pch_pfit.dst, &area))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + drm_rect_translate(&crtc_state->pch_pfit.dst, -area.x1, -area.y1);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int intel_crtc_compute_pipe_mode(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> @@ -2645,6 +2675,10 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = intel_crtc_compute_pfit(state, crtc_state);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> intel_crtc_compute_pixel_rate(crtc_state);
>
> if (crtc_state->has_pch_encoder)
> @@ -4865,6 +4899,13 @@ copy_joiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> drm_dp_tunnel_ref_get(primary_crtc_state->dp_tunnel_ref.tunnel,
> &secondary_crtc_state->dp_tunnel_ref);
>
> + if (secondary_crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled) {
> + struct drm_rect *dst = &secondary_crtc_state->pch_pfit.dst;
> + int y = dst->y1;
> +
> + drm_rect_translate_to(dst, 0, y);
> + }
> +
Aside from the above minor grammatical issues:
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
-Jonathan Cavitt
> copy_joiner_crtc_state_nomodeset(state, secondary_crtc);
>
> secondary_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = primary_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list