[PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: pass dev_priv explicitly to ALPM_CTL2

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 01:10:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Avoid the implicit dev_priv local variable use, and pass dev_priv
>> explicitly to the ALPM_CTL2 register macro.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
>> index 4d950b22d4f1..05dc1c1d4ac2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
>> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@
>>  #define  ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME(val)		REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_MASK, val)
>>  
>>  #define _ALPM_CTL2_A	0x60954
>> -#define ALPM_CTL2(tran)	_MMIO_TRANS2(dev_priv, tran, _ALPM_CTL2_A)
>> +#define ALPM_CTL2(dev_priv, tran)	_MMIO_TRANS2(dev_priv, tran, _ALPM_CTL2_A)
>
> no usage? should we just delete it?

I believe a recent addition to enable ALPM. Jouni?

BR,
Jani.

>
>>  #define  ALPM_CTL2_SWITCH_TO_ACTIVE_LATENCY_MASK		REG_GENMASK(28, 24)
>>  #define  ALPM_CTL2_SWITCH_TO_ACTIVE_LATENCY(val)		REG_FIELD_PREP(ALPM_CTL2_SWITCH_TO_ACTIVE_LATENCY_MASK, val)
>>  #define  ALPM_CTL2_AUX_LESS_WAKE_TIME_EXTENSION_MASK		REG_GENMASK(19, 16)
>> -- 
>> 2.39.2
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel